July 2026 campaign finance reports: Senate and Congress

We have our finalized field for Congress, managing to avoid a catastrophic outcome in what is now one of the better-funded races, and we’re seeing a decent amount of activity across the board. The April 2026 reports are here, the January 2026 reports are here, the October 2025 reports are here and here, the July 2025 reports are here, and the April 2025 reports are here.

James Talarico – Senate

Shaun Finnie – CD02
Evan Hunt – CD03
Lizzie Fletcher – CD07
Leticia Gutierrez – CD09
Caitlin Rourk – CD10
Bobby Pulido – CD15
Christian Menefee – CD18
Kristin Hook – CD21
Marquette Greene-Scott – CD22
Katy Padilla Stout – CD23
Kevin Burge – CD24
Henry Cuellar – CD28
Sylvia Garcia – CD29
Justin Early – CD31
Vicente Gonzalez – CD34
Johnny Garcia – CD35
Melissa McDonough – CD38


Dist  Name             Raised      Spent      Loans    On Hand
==============================================================
Sen   Talarico     68,555,930 47,007,775          0 21,548,155

02    Finnie        2,729,676  1,260,476  1,961,000  1,469,200
03    Hunt            446,505    402,627     78,338     43,877
07    Fletcher      1,426,056  1,040,012          0  1,702,706
09    Gutierrez        55,357     36,700        500     18,657
10    Rourk           363,958    271,818          0     92,140
15    Pulido        2,960,461  1,804,525          0  1,155,936
18    Menefee       3,637,578  3,481,562          0    156,015
21    Hook            243,839    144,127        131    104,069
22    Greene-Scott     53,760     53,614          0        126
23    Stout           488,813    311,556      7,392    176,111
24    Burge           149,621    127,433          0     22,187
28    Cuellar       2,231,952  1,150,307    301,000  1,129,603
29    Garcia          987,247  1,158,183          0    200,972
31    Early           123,521    106,122     58,737     17,399
34    Gonzalez      3,773,915  1,523,562          0  2,532,412
35    Garcia          931,699    608,591          0    323,108
38    McDonough        66,928     45,689    113,239     43,939

I do enjoy the July Congressional finance reporting period, because there’s a much smaller group of candidates I need to follow. This is still a somewhat optimistic list, but everyone on here at least has a shot at raising $100K. Before 2018, outside of whoever was running in CD23, you’d have had a hard time finding a non-incumbent in that group. That to me remains worth noting.

I’d say it’s likely that James Talarico tops $100 million in funds raised this cycle. That will do a lot of work for him and for downballot Democrats. Ken Paxton is not performing at that level, or anywhere close to it. Money isn’t destiny and we all know the statewide Dem track record. But still, wow.

Some of the Congressional hopefuls that have raised a decent amount have also been spending it at a fast rate. I don’t scan through the forms so I don’t know what Evan Hunt has been spending his money on – he didn’t have a primary opponent, so it wasn’t that – but I hope he’s gotten some value out of it.

Of the candidates in races that are being targeted by the DCCC, Bobby Pulido is in a class by himself, outpacing the MAGA incumbent and making her say some tentative things about ICE maybe being not so good. Johnny Garcia, who had to win a vital runoff in May, and Katy Padilla Stout, who was a later entrant into that primary and who didn’t really garner much attention until Tony Gonzales self-destructed, are both doing well. I would really love to see some help for Leticia Gutierrez – I will say this again, don’t be fooled by the 2024 numbers in that district, it is a winnable race – but that hasn’t happened as of July.

Shaun Finnie has raised some big money on top of the almost $2M he’s lent himself, which is quite impressive in a much redder district. I’ll be interviewing him soon. CD24 has been one of the least red Republican districts since 2018, even after two more rounds of redistricting. It’s a reach, but in a year like this it’s one of those districts that could surprise you. If there were such a thing as venture capital for Congressional races, I’d advocate for a round of funding for Kevin Burge, who had to win a runoff to get here. You never know, that’s all I’m saying.

That’s all for now on the finance reports. I’ll wait till January for HISD and HCC. Hope you found this useful, as always let me know what you think.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The 2021 election isn’t quite finished yet

Amazing.

A recent court ruling invalidating an amendment to the Texas Constitution could complicate Harris County’s plan for financing the Toro District and send ripples through a network of little-known taxing districts the county formed prior to the ruling.

The amendment, which voters approved as Proposition 2 in 2021, was framed as giving county reinvestment zones the ability to issue debt. But some counties responded by creating these zones for the first time. Harris County has since created four and is negotiating with the Houston Texans and Howard Hughes Communities to form a fifth in northwest Harris County.

The deal would fund infrastructure around a new headquarters and training facility for the Texans on an 83-acre site in the Bridgeland area.

But state District Judge Jan Soifer’s July 10 ruling in a lawsuit brought by a group of conservative organizations may frustrate those plans.

Soifer agreed with the plaintiffs’ allegation that the ballot language used to describe the amendment failed to inform voters how the zones’ investments would be paid for – namely, by issuing bonds.

“Therefore,” Soifer wrote, “the ballot language of Proposition 2 … omitted a chief feature of the amendment and misled the voters.”

The lawsuit was brought against the Texas Secretary of State’s Office by Texas Uniting for Reform and Freedom, Grassroots America — We the People PAC and the True Texas Project. The organizations warned the language was misleading in a letter one of their lawyers sent state officials in August 2021, before the issue appeared on the ballot.

Attorney Garrett McMillan pointed to a “nearly identical” proposal voters rejected in 2011. That proposal, he wrote, made clear that the reinvestment zones would fund projects through property taxes, unlike the 2021 measure.

McMillan warned that his clients intended to sue should the proposition be put before voters unchanged.

“Our clients would prefer that Texas voters be informed of what they are voting on rather than misled and would like the wording of the proposition to be changed to reflect (its) effect,” McMillan wrote.

While Proposition 2 primarily empowered counties to issue debt against the tax revenue collected through reinvestment zones, some counties took it as a signal that they could begin creating zones, as cities had for decades before them.

Commissioners Court approved the first county-run reinvestment zone in December 2022 covering the Aldine area. Commissioners have voted to create three more since then, with the commissioner whose precinct the zone is in typically appointing a majority of the board members.

I didn’t pay much attention to this proposition, which was broadly endorsed and seemingly anodyne. I don’t know if the outfits that filed this suit waited until a county did something that they claimed was illegal based on the wording of the proposition or if it just took a long time to get to this point, but it sure is at least a bit annoying that it took almost five years to get to this point, well past the time that counties had been doing things based on its passage. What happens next is unclear – there will surely be appeals, but in the meantime counties need to interpret the ruling based on what they have done. That’ll be Abbie Kamin’s assignment. Maybe there’s a workaround for this, and maybe counties will have to completely redo what they’ve done or risk getting sued by their own local antagonists. I guess I’m a little mad at whoever worded the prop as they did, but whatever concerns there were about that at the time were not taken seriously enough to affect it. So here we are.

Posted in Election 2021, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

City’s minority business contracting program ruled unconstitutional

This is bullshit.

A federal judge has ruled Houston’s minority-owned business contracting program unconstitutional and blocked the city from “using racial preferences” in awarding public contracts as affirmative action programs come under fire nationwide.

A white couple from Spring sued the city in 2023, alleging their lawn care business, Landscape Consultants of Texas, Inc., could not “compete on an equal footing with other businesses” as they were ineligible for certification in the city’s longstanding program designed to even the playing field for minorities, women and small businesses.

Houston since 1984 has set goals to give certain percentages of various types of city contracts to certified small businesses and those owned by women and minorities.

The city’s Office of Business Opportunity also runs programs to help businesses owned by veterans, those with disabilities and members of the LGBTQ+ community.

In a Tuesday ruling, U.S. District Judge David Hittner said the program was in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Houston awarded $2.5 billion in construction, professional services, and other goods and services contracts in its 2025 fiscal year, $579 million of which went to certified minority, women, and small businesses across more than 1,600 separate contracts.

Hispanic-owned businesses received 34% of that $579 million in contracts, followed by Asian-owned businesses 22%, firms owned by white women at 17% and Black-owned firms at 14%.

Carol Guess, current chair of the Texas Association of African-American Chambers of Commerce and former president of the Greater Houston Black Chamber of Commerce, said it appeared as though the judge had unjustly applied a narrow ruling the U.S. Supreme Court made in relation to racial preference in college applications to a local program.

Guess called the ruling a “huge blow” to Black-owned businesses across the state, especially those in Houston where city leaders weren’t yet meeting contracting goals. She worried about the possibility of other municipalities complying with the ruling and walking back their MWBE programs to avoid costly court battles.

“This court has opened the door for other courts to expand the application of (the Harvard ruling),” Guess said. “They made a choice to do that. And now the door is open for many other municipalities, for their MWBE programs to be enjoined.”

Arturo Michel, the city’s lead attorney, said his team is evaluating a potential appeal to the court’s decision, and said the ruling would not impact other areas of the Office of Business Opportunity.

This program has existed for over 40 years, but now that we have a corrupt Supreme Court, nothing matters. Using the 14th Amendment, one of the pillars of the Reconstruction, as the pretext for this is grotesque. The same chuckleheads who filed here are also suing Harris County, so I do unfortunately expect dominoes to fall. All over a program that ultimately directs less than 25% of the contracting funds to these firms, of which about one in six are owned by white women. It’s ridiculous, and it’s hard to imagine a successful appeal. I wish I had something constructive to say about this but I don’t. Houston Public Media has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Greg Abbott would really like everyone to stop talking about data centers already

Gina Hinojosa is talking about them.

Gina Hinojosa, the Democrat running for governor, on Thursday called on Gov. Greg Abbott to halt all data center construction in the state until lawmakers craft rules for the projects, which have voters up in arms.

The Austin state representative accused Abbott of trying to punt the potentially toxic political issue to after November’s high-stakes midterms, arguing he should call lawmakers back to Austin now for a special session to set regulations.

“Greg Abbott talks a big game about what he will do after the election. The thing is, he has the power to do it today,” Hinojosa said during a press conference. “This problem is in his lap and in his lap alone.”

[…]

Hinojosa said data centers are the “embodiment” of the populist themes she is campaigning on.

“Is this a state that is by and for the people, or the billionaires’ playground and we just live here?” she said.

Abbott’s position on data centers has shifted rapidly amid his run for a record-breaking fourth term. He has gone from touting Texas as the “epicenter of AI development” in November to vowing to push back against “AI data centers” earlier this month.

[…]

She was joined at her Thursday press conference by a handful of residents living in communities with data centers, including Tom Weeks of Granbury. Weeks said his community is “under siege” by the noisy developments that rumble throughout the night leaving him and his neighbors sleep deprived.

Weeks told Hearst Newspapers he is a lifelong Republican who has voted for Abbott every time he’s been on the ballot. Now Weeks said he is a “one-issue voter” and will not support Abbott again.

“I think Abbott right now is just pandering,” Weeks said. “If he wins, he’ll go right back to his former stance. I don’t think he’s going to change.”

So are other people.

Calls are growing among data center opponents for Gov. Greg Abbott to call a special session for lawmakers to rein in the projects that have roiled rural communities.

On Monday morning, in advance of two interim hearings this week dealing with data centers, grassroots organizers from across the state convened at the Capitol to voice their opposition to the massive computing centers that have proliferated rapidly over the last year.

The protest comes as data centers have emerged as an unexpected flashpoint ahead of November’s midterms. Roughly 40 people held signs reading “Governor Abbott is all hat and no cattle” and chanted “special session now.”

[…]

Troy Jones, a GOP precinct chair from Paris, said Abbott has not gone far enough.

“To go far enough would be to have a special session to get the House and the Senate to get on board and to get something done,” Jones said. “It just keeps getting kicked down the road. Nobody really wants to do anything. Counties’ hands are tied. They can’t do anything.”

Abbott is the only official with the power to bring lawmakers back for a special session.

Sid Miller, the outgoing Republican Agricultural Commissioner whom Abbott campaigned against in the primary, pointed to the governor’s office and urged the crowd to call on him to act.

“He can hear everything we’re saying, and I invite him to come down here and join us today,” Miller said. “The governor has authority to bring the legislature back tomorrow. He can have them in session tomorrow. So we’re calling on him to do just that.”

[…]

Clayton Tucker, a Democrat running to replace Miller, also spoke. Tucker has built his campaign against data centers and is one of a growing number of Democrats calling for a moratorium as they try to capitalize on the growing rural resentment.

[…]

On Monday, lawmakers began considering options to limit or repeal a decade-old sales tax exemption for data centers that is costing the state more than $1 billion annually.

The 2013 law, a sales tax exemption for qualifying data centers, means data center developers don’t pay taxes on things like electricity, cooling systems and servers for up to two decades.

“What we thought we were voting for back in 2013, it’s a much different animal these days,” said state Sen. Joan Huffman, a Houston Republican who chairs the Senate finance committee. “It’s time and it’s appropriate and necessary for the Legislature to reexamine whether this exemption still delivers a return that justifies its rapidly mounting foregone tax revenue.”

Lawmakers initially forecast that the exemption would cost the state only $14.6 million in forgone revenue in 2014 and 2015. But even early projections “significantly” underestimated the cost of the sales tax exemption, said Brad Reynolds, the chief revenue estimator at the Comptroller’s office. “Of course, we never anticipated the kind of rapid development in numbers and scale that we see today.”

The exemption is estimated to cost the state $3.3 billion in the 2028-2029 biennium.

In 2026 alone, the number of data centers that qualify for the exemption has nearly doubled, Reynolds said. Of the 138 data centers that qualify for exemption, 59 have been certified this year.

It’s kind of amazing how well this one issue stacks up against Abbott. There’s the flip-flops and weasel words, which even Republicans aren’t buying. There’s the billions in taxpayer dollars going towards trillion-dollar companies to get them to build more data centers here. There’s the utter lack of influence local governments have over these beasts, because Republicans that used to champion local control decided in the past few years that beating up cities was more important. There’s the price of electricity and the concern about water. There’s Abbott’s ruthless willingness to call special sessions when he feels they suit his needs, and the easy understanding that no real action will be taken in the spring, because by then it won’t be an immediate electoral issue. There’s even the reanimated corpse of a hell-hath-no-fury Republican that Abbott took out in the primary appearing at rallies with the Democratic candidate to replace him because he feels so strongly on this issue. Abbott has one move, and that’s to duck and cover and hope it isn’t as salient as Gina Hinojosa wants it to be. He isn’t good for much, but that there is right in his sweet spot.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fort Bend update

Still waiting on the courts.

Fort Bend County’s Democratic commissioners remain in a stalemate with their Republican counterparts over Daniel Wong’s authority to serve as county judge – a key question as the suburban Houston-area county approaches tax rate discussions and the elected position is set to be on the November ballot.

The county resident who filed a lawsuit last fall against former county judge KP George – which led to Wong’s interim appointment in April – is asking a district court judge to help provide an answer.

Wong, a Republican who is facing Commissioner Dexter McCoy in November’s county judge election, was appointed to serve in the role by Judge Jeth Jones. The visiting Republican judge from Galveston County did so while suspending George – in response to a civil lawsuit filed by a resident who claimed George violated her free-speech rights and was incompetent to hold office. Jones’ decision followed George’s criminal conviction in March on felony money laundering charges.

Now an attorney representing the resident who filed the civil suit, Sarah Roberts, is asking Jones to vacate his temporary appointment of Wong as of June 17, the date the lawsuit was initially dismissed at Roberts’ request.

Jones presided over a court hearing last Thursday that included Roberts’ attorney as well as legal counsel for Wong, who is challenging Roberts’ request. Jones called the case “complex” and indicated he would make a ruling “soon,” also discussing the possibility of another hearing in the case.

In addition to arguing that Wong’s appointment became invalidated when the lawsuit against George was dismissed, Roberts’ attorney, Dylan B. Russell, also argued that his client lacked standing to sue in the first place because a county attorney or county district attorney was not involved in litigating the matter.

“We’re asking the court simply to clarify what we believe is the law already, just to put it in writing,” Russell said during Thursday’s court hearing.

In the meantime, Wong is locked in a separate lawsuit filed by Fort Bend County Attorney Bridgette Smith-Lawson, a Democrat who also is seeking to have Wong’s appointment invalidated because of the dismissal of the civil lawsuit. Wong’s legal team argues his appointment was subsequently confirmed by the commissioners court and that Texas’ holdover provision allows him to stay in office pending the results of the upcoming election.

See here for the most recent update. It did not occur to me that the person who filed the original lawsuit that led to Daniel Wong being appointed as Fort Bend County Judge would later argue that they didn’t have standing to sue. I feel like that is a situation that is not often covered in law school. Be that as it may, if Judge Jones is good to his word that he will rule on this “soon”, then perhaps we will be able to move forward one way or the other.

Meanwhile, in the other lawsuits:

The district judge responsible for deciding whether Daniel Wong’s interim appointment remains valid — despite a lawsuit claiming it’s not — is a known supporter of Wong, critics allege, calling into question a possible conflict of interest.

[…]

Wong sued the county attorney’s office on July 6, challenging Smith-Lawson’s legal opinion that his interim appointment expired. Smith-Lawson countersued, and Wong dropped his legal challenge, saying at the time that he saw no need to litigate the same issues in two separate court cases. Wong’s case had landed in the 248th District Court, where a Democratic judge presides.

The matter now lies in the hands of Republican District Judge Edward Krenek because that’s where Smith-Lawson’s “quo warranto” filing was assigned. Krenek and Wong are both prominent figures in the Fort Bend County Republican Party, and some critics have said that the two are close friends, suggesting that Krenek and his wife Tricia, a justice of the peace, were photographed “campaigning” for Wong as recently as July 3.

Photos of Krenek and Wong allegedly appeared on the Daniel Wong for Fort Bend County Judge social media page and were later removed, said two members of the Fort Bend Democratic Party who asked to remain anonymous. Krenek did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday on either the status of the case or whether he has campaigned for Wong.

Wong’s critics say they expect Krenek to “slow roll” the case filed by Smith-Lawson and let the clock run out so Wong remains the interim judge until the November 3 election and gets the advantage of being the incumbent, even though he’s never been elected to that post.

[Wong spokesman Buddy] Eberle said Fort Bend County Republicans frequently see each other at events and occasionally photos are taken. “That doesn’t reflect any sort of special relationship,” he said. “I think that is just low-hanging fruit for the Democrats to complain about. Judge Wong handles his office very seriously and I know Judge Krenek does too. They’re both professionals and they’ll continue to do their jobs.”

Eberle said he didn’t have any insight into when a ruling would be made, only that Krenek’s court accepted the quo warranto motion filed by Smith-Lawson. “Our legal team is fully prepared to respond but we don’t know the exact timeline right now,” Eberle said.

Gotta say, dropping the lawsuit that was assigned to a court with a Democratic judge is a good piece of legal strategy. County Attorney Smith-Lawson could file a motion for Judge Krenek to recuse himself, but that’s always a risky move. And to be fair, he should be expected to do his job and follow the law. I personally would need a little more than this to buy into the conflict of interest allegations. I don’t think they’re meritless, but they’re not sufficient. Perhaps Smith-Lawson sees it the same way. And perhaps Judge Jones will render this all moot.

Posted in Election 2026, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

More robotaxi safety issues

Austin has had quite the experience.

Federal safety regulators are demanding answers from Waymo, Tesla, Zoox and other autonomous-vehicle developers after documenting a pattern of driverless vehicles interfering with first responders.

Last week, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ordered the companies to explain by the end of July how they will keep their vehicles from entering emergency scenes, blocking responders or failing to recognize flashing lights and other hazards. The incidents have renewed questions about whether robotaxis are safe enough to operate on public streets and prompted calls from some experts to slow their expansion.

Austin has seen such incidents firsthand. In one high-profile case, first responders heading to a March 1 mass shooting downtown faced an unexpected obstacle: self-driving robotaxis.

The shooting left three people dead and the gunman was fatally shot by police. Fifteen others were injured.

As first responders converged on the area, as many as five autonomous vehicles froze near the scene. One sat perpendicular across the roadway for nearly a minute before a police officer was able to climb into the front seat and move it.

Austin-Travis County EMS officials have said the mishap did not affect patient outcomes.

But robotaxis either blocked traffic or ignored the direction of Austin police in 25% of reported incidents from July 2023 to June 2026, according to the city of Austin’s autonomous vehicle database. Data collected by the city since 2023 shows interference with law enforcement and other traffic is among the top safety concerns surrounding autonomous vehicles in the city.

Experts say the incidents have helped highlight the limited power Texas cities have to regulate the technology on their own streets.

“If Waymo or another company’s autonomous driving system can’t handle flashing lights and sirens in a crisis, it isn’t ready for public roads,” said Cooper Lohr, a senior policy analyst for transportation and safety at Consumer Reports. “It should be removed from service until the company proves it will handle the situation appropriately.”

[…]

Federal regulators are scrutinizing several self-driving car companies operating in Austin over a number of other issues.

Tesla’s Full Self-Driving technology is under investigation over collisions in low-visibility conditions, including a crash in which a pedestrian was fatally struck. The investigation covers incidents involving consumer vehicles, but Tesla notably uses Full Self-Driving technology in its robotaxi service.

Tesla’s technology relies mainly on cameras, instead of additional technology such as lidar and radar sensors that other companies, including Waymo, Zoox and Avride, rely on. But even with overlapping sensors, other companies are facing investigations over safety concerns.

The National Transportation Safety Board and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are investigating Waymo after vehicles failed to stop for school buses with extended stop arms on more than 25 occasions since August. In at least one instance, a remote human operator told the car to pass the bus.

The company later issued a  nationwide recall after one of its vehicles was swept away in San Antonio floodwaters.

Avride is being probed after 16 crashes in Dallas and Austin in which it failed to detect other vehicles or objects. The Austin-based company is testing its autonomous vehicles in the city but has launched public services in Dallas on the Uber app.

In all, Avride has reported 24 crashes in Austin since June 2025. Tesla’s count stands at 20, and Zoox has had two crashes. Waymo, with it’s much larger fleet, has seen 113 crashes in the same period.

Amazon-owned Zoox, which recently began testing its purpose-built robotaxis in Austin, said it has engaged with first responders and city officials for training, especially because its vehicles do not have a steering wheel or foot pedals. The company plans to begin offering rides to a limited group by the end of the year.

The pitch for self-driving vehicles is to make roads safer, Center for Auto Safety executive director Michael Brooks told the Statesman. But the technology has not yet progressed that point, he said.

“These companies want growth to happen quickly, and they want to scale their operations very, very quickly in order to appeal to shareholders and investors,” Brooks said. “But frankly, it’s dangerous. They want to scale as rapidly as possible. But we need a slower and more safety-focused approach.”

Amid a push for rapid expansion, Austin officials say the companies have been reluctant to engage publicly with local leaders — and under Texas law, they are not required to.

It’s a long story and a gift link, so read the rest. This is in some ways a higher-stakes version of the sleeper problem, which is annoying and wasteful but not dangerous. I’ve blogged about a number of the things discussed in this story, but it’s something else to see it all put together in one place.

It’s not clear what cities can do about a lot of this. As noted, cities have basically no regulatory control over rideshare companies or autonomous vehicles. It’s all on the state, and we know how much they care about stuff like this, not to mention how much funding they have for enforcement. The companies have responded as you’d expect in the absence of any incentive, giving lip service to things like training for law enforcement on how to interact with their robotaxis, and then not following up on it. One Austin City Council member suggested in the story that they could jack up the fines for violations involving robotaxis, to something like $50K per ticket, on the theory that it might at least get their attention. I like the idea, but suspect it wouldn’t survive first contact with judicial review. Still seems worth a shot. Maybe Houston can benefit from Austin’s experience, because all of this is going to ramp up here as well. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of July 27

The Texas Progressive Alliance has not made any nuclear deals in the past week but it did put together this roundup.

Off the Kuff goes back to the future with the latest school finance lawsuit, filed by Midland ISD.

Neil at Houston Democracy Project Blog said Hitchcock City Council in Galveston County voted to reject formal cooperation with ICE. They said it would tank local trust in law enforcement & placed concern for people of Hitchcock over Abbott & Trump.

===========================

And here are some posts of interest from other Texas blogs.

Texas Monthly celebrates Butthole Surfer Summer.

CultureMap introduces us to the 2026 State Fair of Texas’ music lineup.

Gwen Howerton is being driven insane by crappy AI-generated flyers around Houston.

D Magazine is done with the Alamo Drafthouse.

Deceleration reports on anti-ICE activity in San Antonio.

Law Dork recounts the many screwups of the Trump Justice Department in their effort to subpoena reporters from the New York Times.

Franklin Strong finds a whole bunch of classic books that have been removed from school libraries, and says that was an intended effect of the school library censorship law.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TPOR poll: Talarico 45, Paxton 40

First poll in a month, it’s a solid one for James Talarico.

Rep. James Talarico

The latest survey of the U.S. Senate race from Texas Public Opinion Research shows Democrat James Talarico leading Republican Ken Paxton, 45% to 40%, marking the Austin state representative’s largest lead in any public poll taken during the general election period.

Since Paxton locked up the GOP nomination in late May, polling of the contest has found a neck-and-neck race with neither candidate able to break 50%. But TPOR’s poll found Talarico leading among voters who do not have a college degree — a group that has consistently favored Republicans in Texas and across the country — and dominating among independents, less than a quarter of whom said they planned to vote for Paxton. The attorney general also had weaker Republican support than in other recent surveys, with nearly one in five GOP voters saying they were undecided or would vote for Talarico.

TPOR labels itself as a nonpartisan public opinion research group. It is directed by Democratic strategist Luke Warford.

The group surveyed 1,048 likely voters between July 15 and July 17, and has a margin of error of +/- 3.4 percentage points. Of those poll respondents, 53% voted for Donald Trump and 42% voted for Kamala Harris in 2024, making the sample only slightly bluer than the 2024 electorate, which favored Trump by a 14-point margin in Texas. Trump carried Texas by 5.6 percentage points in 2020, two years after the last midterm held during his presidency.

TPOR’s previous poll, fielded just after the May 26 runoff in which Paxton defeated Sen. John Cornyn, found Talarico leading 47% to 44%.

[…]

Paxton’s 40% vote share is the lowest he has received in a public poll post-runoff. Other surveys have found Republicans were consolidating behind him. But the TPOR poll had Talarico winning 7% of self-described Republicans, and an additional 12% remained undecided. Meanwhile, only 1% of self-identified Democrats indicated they would vote for Paxton, and 6% were undecided.

For comparison, a New York Times/Siena poll of the Texas contest fielded in June, which found the overall result tied at 47%, found Talarico winning 5% of Republicans and only 4% unsure.

Perhaps the biggest outlier was Talarico’s lead among non-college-educated voters, who favored the Democrat by nine percentage points — 45% to 36%. He led by 1 percentage point among those with at least a bachelor’s degree.

[…]

Other results hewed closer to recent polling of the race. The TPOR poll found Talarico leading heavily among Black and Latino voters, while Paxton maintained a strong lead with white voters. Black voters broke 71% for Talarico and 8% for Paxton, while Latinos preferred Talarico by a 66% to 20% margin.

Paxton led among white voters, 53% to 33%.

Talarico’s polling lead owes to his strength with independents and non-college educated voters. The poll found Talarico garnering 43% of independents to Paxton’s 23%; 29% remain undecided. Among self-described moderates, Talarico’s lead is even more pronounced, with the Democrat ahead 54% to 20%.

The poll found that 14% of voters of all political stripes remain unsure about their pick. Among undecided voters, there is evidence Paxton has more room to grow: 19% of that bloc said they leaned toward the Republican, compared to 10% who leaned toward Talarico. Two-thirds reported being truly on the fence.

Elsewhere on the ballot, the TPOR poll finds Republicans leading in the contests for governor and attorney general — though both are also close.

In the governor’s race, incumbent Republican Greg Abbott was leading Democratic state Rep. Gina Hinojosa of Austin by a 3-point margin, 45% to 42%. And in the open race to succeed Paxton as attorney general, Republican state Sen. Mayes Middleton of Galveston was up 39% to 38% over Democratic state Sen. Nathan Johnson of Dallas, well within the margin of error.

This is the third TPOR poll of the Senate race since March. Both showed Talarico leading, with him up 47-44 over Paxton post-GOP runoff as noted above, and up 46-41 in April. TPOR seems to be the most favorable pollster to Talarico, which may indicate a house effect or may just be a more consistent sample. The lead Talarico has among Latino voters – that 66-20 spread is dominant, probably the best showing he’s had so far – plus the lead he has among independents, are the strongest indicators that he’s in a position to win. You always have to be extra careful when dealing with subsamples, but TPOR does have bigger overall samples to begin with than many pollsters (1048 in this poll), so the subgroups aren’t as small. If these are indicative numbers, you have to like Talarico’s chances, and you have to hope he has some coattails.

As always, though, this is one result and a snapshot in time. The next poll could be different in any number of ways. TPOR’s writeup is here, they have a link to their toplines but you have to ask for their crosstabs.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

One witness to Lorenzo Salgado Araujo’s killing to be released from detention

A good start.

A federal judge on Monday ordered the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to release from their custody one of the witnesses to a federal immigration agent’s fatal shooting of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo.

Jose Trinidad Rojas Pliego must be released from detention within 48 hours of the order, which was issued Monday evening. Authorities must release Rojas Pliego in a public space and give his attorneys notice at least three hours beforehand, according to the order.

[…]

U.S. District Judge Keith Ellison’s order for Rojas Pliego’s release comes less than a week after he issued a separate order blocking Rojas Pliego’s deportation, and he noted in Monday’s order that Rojas Pliego’s request is “one of hundreds of similar petitions” amid the Trump administration’s application of immigration detention protocol.

Ellison’s order states that the government is not permitted to detain noncitizens without “individualized justification” only because they did not enter the country lawfully. It also stipulates that DHS must seek a pre-detention hearing before it seeks to re-detain Rojas Pliego.

See here and here for some background. Rojas Pliego, along with Daniel Tirado Pantoja and Victor Hugo Salgado Araujo, ae the only known witnesses to Salgado Araujo’s killing, and thus the only counter to ICE’s lies. Keeping them all in the country so they can testify – and really, be allowed to return to their quiet, productive lives – is clearly for the best. Hopefully we’ll get quick rulings in favor of the other two as well.

Posted in La Migra | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Corpus gets another reprieve

Hope they make good use of it.

Corpus Christi got “tremendous” news Monday when the city’s projected water emergency was delayed until fall 2028 — a year later than previously anticipated — as floodwater from recent intense storms continues flowing into some of the region’s reservoirs.

Water heading downstream from hard-hit areas of Texas is expected to continue arriving in area reservoirs, potentially easing water-use restrictions for city residents and giving Corpus Christi added time and breathing room to strengthen its water system.

“This is really, really good news for the community, and it gives us time to bring on our water supply projects without the stress of heading into a Level 1 water emergency,” City Manager Peter Zanoni said at a morning water briefing.

Corpus Christi, Texas’ eighth-largest city, has been racing to avoid a water emergency in which demand outpaces available water supplies. For months the city has been under pressure to find new sources of water for 500,000 people served across seven counties, along with one of the nation’s largest petrochemical corridors and the Port of Corpus Christi, the country’s top port for crude oil exports. Officials have asked residents and businesses to cut their water use.

Earlier this year, city projections showed that “day zero” — the point when water demand is projected to be six months from exceeding supply — could arrive as early as May, triggering a Level 1 emergency declaration.

Spring rains pushed that estimate back to September 2027, but not before drawing statewide and national attention as the city appeared to be the first major U.S. city on track to run short of water.

The new Level 1 water emergency date is forecasted to be September 2028.

[…]

Five years of drought had depleted the city’s two main reservoirs: Choke Canyon, fed by the Frio River, and Lake Corpus Christi, fed by the Nueces River. The capacity of Choke Canyon is three times that of Lake Corpus Christi.

As of Monday, the biggest gain from floodwater has been at Choke Canyon Reservoir, the city’s largest water resource. The lake climbed in the past week from 7.9% of capacity to 24%. The reservoir was last consistently full in the early 2000s and has been below 50% full since 2013.

The combined level of Choke Canyon and Lake Corpus Christi is 26.2%, Zanoni said. The city is currently in Stage 3 drought restrictions, which bars outdoor irrigation. City modelers show the lakes could get to 30% combined capacity by this weekend, which would allow the city to move to Stage 2 restrictions, allowing residents to water the lawns and irrigate once every other week.

See here for some background. This is a reminder that “better” does not need to mean “good”. In this case, it just means “not as immediately catastrophic”. I would politely suggest that regardless of what level those lakes get to, Corpus keep those Stage 3 restrictions in place. That, and putting some real restrictions on the industrial water users might enable them to stay away from “catastrophic” long enough to see if any of those desalinization plans might work. Or something else, I don’t know. Just don’t piss this opportunity away, that’s all I’m saying.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

On Whitmire and ICE

Here we go again.

Mayor John Whitmire

For the second time in four months, Mayor John Whitmire is facing intense criticism over his handling of federal immigration enforcement, an issue he has spent much of his first term trying to keep out of city politics.

The latest test came this month after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents fatally shot Lorenzo Salgado Araujo during a traffic stop in Magnolia Park. Whitmire’s initial response to the killing – and a bruising city council fight over Houston’s cooperation with ICE in April – have led political observers to question whether Whitmire’s handling of both cases will let him maintain the alliance of moderate Democrats, independents and Republicans that has fueled his political success.

In April, Whitmire led the effort to roll back a new city ordinance limiting police cooperation with ICE after Gov. Greg Abbott threatened to withhold state grants. This month, he initially said the city could not independently investigate Salgado’s death because federal authorities had jurisdiction before reversing course to call for an independent investigation and a 90-day pause in ICE operations.

Together, the episodes have become one of the clearest tests yet of Whitmire’s governing style.

A moderate Democrat with five decades in elected office, Whitmire has spent his career working across the aisle, repeatedly touting that his “reasonable” approach has shielded Houston from the worst of President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown. Progressive critics say that instinct has left immigrant communities at risk. But Whitmire allies, including Latino elected officials and community leaders, say critics overlook both his decades-long record with Houston’s Latino community and the legal constraints state law places on the city.

In his first extended interview with the Houston Chronicle since August 2025, Whitmire said politics hasn’t influenced his approach to ICE issues, arguing there’s no time for politics when dealing with a tragedy.

“I have to do what I think maintains the unity of our city, and that is a real challenge. Immigration is a very divisive issue,” Whitmire said. “Most of my critics are just looking for something to harm me. They don’t harm me. I’m in good shape. They harm the city by creating divisiveness.”

Whitmire told the Chronicle his pivot after the Salgado shooting was not driven by public pressure.

“Pressure? I don’t even know what that is… What changed the intensity of my comments was the report [Garcia] gave me after meeting with the witnesses,” he said, referring to a discussion he had with U.S. Rep. Sylvia Garcia, D-Houston.

There’s a lot more, and I’ve run out of gift subscriptions for the month, so you’ll have to find your own way to read the rest. I’m going to state a few things and then move on.

– I will absolutely stipulate that it sucks having to deal with ICE and the never-ending depredations of the Trump and Abbott administrations. There are few options to respond, and most of them are not good. I wouldn’t wish this on anyone.

– That said, no one forced John Whitmire to run for Mayor in 2023, and no one is forcing him to run for re-election. He chose this and is choosing it again.

– I don’t know about you, but when I hear Whitmire talk about “critics” and “divisiveness”, it’s clear to me that he has more resentment for and spends more time and energy responding to the people who show up at City Hall and make noise than he does about, you know, ICE and Trump and Abbott. I question the wisdom of that choice.

– The main debate in Democratic politics right now is less about “left” and “center” and much more about whether one has a willingness to use every lever of power available to you as an elected official to push back against the fascism and depravity of the Trump goons, or a belief that compromise and sticking to basics and picking their battles is the better way to go. All of us knows where Whitmire lands on this spectrum.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Who wants to fight cancer?

Not Greg Abbott.

Texas spent billions recruiting scientists from around the world to turn the state into a cancer-research powerhouse. Now, nearly six months after Gov. Greg Abbott restricted public institutions’ use of the H-1B visa program, cancer advocates and immigration attorneys warn the policy could undercut that strategy.

At MD Anderson Cancer Center, researchers holding H-1B work visas explore why tumors resist treatment, test new drugs and use artificial intelligence to analyze tissue cell by cell. Records obtained by The Texas Tribune show the Houston institution sponsors 277 workers through the program.

Across Texas, 44 public universities, health centers and system offices reported sponsoring 3,332 H-1B workers to the Texas Workforce Commission. The higher education institutions had to detail their use of such employees as part of Abbott’s directive.

The records do not establish whether Abbott’s policy has disrupted research, clinical trials or patient care. But Lore Gruenbaum, chief scientific officer and senior vice president of research at Blood Cancer United, said these types of restrictions send “a chilling message that foreign-born researchers are less welcome” at a time when institutions already face difficulty recruiting and retaining young scientists.

Gruenbaum estimated that foreign-born students make up more than 40% of the graduate-student pool in biomedical research and at least half of postdoctoral trainees.

“If we don’t have that talent pool available, the quality and the scope and the impact of the research that can be done will very likely decrease,” she said.

There’s more, but this is enough to make a simple statement that I can’t believe I have to say: We should cut government red tape to allow these highly beneficial engines of our economy do what they do best. There’s a limited number of people in the world who have the talent and the drive to do what these people do. For a long time, they flocked to the US because they were able to get top-notch college educations followed by prestigious graduate degrees, and then they went to work in the best scientific research academies in existence. And we all benefitted from that arrangement, whether any of us needed or had a loved one who needed a medicine or treatment or surgical procedure they pioneered or not. And now, thanks to the racist shitweasels in Washington and their craven enablers in the states like Greg Abbott, we are in the process of throwing that all away, for nothing.

That’s what this is about. We can do a small something about it this November, and a bigger one in two years. It’s up to us.

Posted in La Migra, Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Houston to bid for 2031 Women’s World Cup

Excellent.

Days after the end of the 2026 FIFA World Cup for men’s soccer teams, Houston officials said their hosting seven matches was a major success. Now, they’re moving forward with bidding to host the Women’s World Cup.

“We will make a formal bid to FIFA, along with a couple of others, and present why we think Houston should be selected as a host city for the Women’s World Cup in 2031,” Ryan Walsh, CEO of the Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, toldHouston Public Mediaon Wednesday.

The 2027 Women’s World Cup will be hosted in Brazil from June 24-July 25, 2027. FIFA is expected to announce the host countries for the 2031 tournament in the coming months, but thus far only one bid has been submitted: a joint submission from the United States, Mexico, Costa Rica and Jamaica.

[…]

There likely would be some notable exceptions, however. Most notably, the women’s tournament would likely be scaled to different venues.

“It’s a different size, but we want to continue that excitement,” Walsh said. “We certainly want to make sure that they understand that the collaboration is still there.”

Houston is also expected to make bids for other international sporting events in the coming months and years, Walsh said, including the Rugby World Cup also in 2031; the World Masters Athletics Championship, a track and field tournament for athletes 35 and older; and several opportunities for the NCAA tournaments, including Final Four and Sweet 16 games.

See here for some background; based on that previous post, to the best of my knowledge the US is locked in as one of the host countries for 2031. It’s a matter of which cities will do the honors, and not surprisingly there are many other possible suitors. We have the experience from this year and our well-regarded Reliant Stadium as well as Shell Energy Stadium as the venues, so I feel pretty good about our chances. And also, the Rugby World Cup sounds awesome. I’ll be rooting for that one as well.

Posted in Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

July 2026 campaign finance reports – City of Houston

The big news on the Houston municipal offices campaign finance front is that the city has a brand new reporting system, one in which you now get a permalink to the candidates’ reports. You’ll see those below. It’s faster than the previous system as well, which I certainly appreciate. I don’t see a way to look at previous filing periods – the legacy system is still up, if you have a hankering to see the last District C special election reports. I don’t expect previous reports to migrate forward, so as long as that link is still available, I can live with that. Now that the special elections for City Council are behind us, you can see the start of the 2027 election season from here, as several new names show up, with offices specified. Let’s check them out. The January 2026 reports are here, the July 2025 reports are here and the January 2025 reports are here.

John Whitmire – Mayor

Chris Hollins – Controller

Julian Ramirez – AL1
Willie Davis – AL2
Twila Carter – AL3
Alejandra Salinas – AL4
Sallie Alcorn – AL5

Amy Peck – District A
Tarsha Jackson – District B
Joe Panzarella – District C
Carolyn Evans-Shabazz – District D
Fred Flickinger – District E
Tiffany Thomas – District F
Mary Nan Huffman – District G
Mario Castillo – District H
Joaquin Martinez – District I
Ed Pollard – District J
Martha Castex-Tatum – District K

Neeloy Azad – Mayor
Jovon Tyler
Leah Wolfthal – AL5
Bradley Mushinski – AL5
Anthony Collier – District B
Bryan Smart – District B
Frederick Woods – District B
Rashad Cave – District D
Alan Steinberg – District F
Aleja Newman – District K

Sylvester Turner
Mike Laster
David Robinson
Robert Gallegos
Patrick Oathout
Audrey Nath


Candidate     Raised      Spent       Loan     On Hand
======================================================
Whitmire   1,131,171    223,251          0   3,846,136

Hollins      193,244     98,993          0     607,360

Ramirez       64,895      8,383     30,000     227,618
Davis              0      8,528          0       8,164
Carter        37,500     11,204      3,900     127,190
Salinas       43,076     51,265     95,000       3,028
Alcorn        12,250     38,672          0      54,351

Peck               0      9,475          0      34,304
Jackson       10,500      6,036          0      14,153
Panzarella    26,477     11,010          0      31,722
E-Shabazz     10,000      5,106          0      22,129
Flickinger    33,100     10,234    103,000      80,761
Thomas           211      4,521          0     259,593
Huffman            0     10,896          0      32,012
Castillo      84,715     19,233          0     224,303
Martinez      38,617     23,603          0      43,917
Pollard      162,451     99,603  1,040,000   2,262,592
C-Tatum            0     11,657          0     355,340

Azad           7,525      8,799          0      39,817
Tyler          1,600      9,369          0       7,515
Wolfthal      39,799      3,355          0     100,605
Mushinski     11,489      5,165      5,000      16,442
Collier        5,640        423          0      21,138
Smart          5,360      4,904          0       4,739
Woods         11,130        901      1,500      12,426
Cave               0          0          0           0
Steinberg      2,000        137          0           0
Newman         1,620      1,166          0       2,254

Turner             0     97,642          0     297,210
Laster             0          0          0     144,383
Robinson           0        500          0     244,750
Gallegos           0        730          0     121,406
Oathout       12,050     28,531     60,441         135
Nath           4,742    107,003          0           0

As before, I have sorted these into current officeholders, current candidates – Jovon Tyler is a candidate for At Large #5, not sure why the system didn’t pick up on that – and former candidates/officeholders. This system was a noticeable improvement from the previous one, in that it provides the direct link to reports as stated before, and also because it was a lot zippier – the reports displayed immediately, instead of taking some number of seconds to download. Kudos to whoever implemented this system, it’s clean and usable.

I’m not going to spend too much time on this, as the city elections won’t be until next year. Some people are already gearing up for that, most notably Mayor Whitmire. CM Ed Pollard has been busy fundraising for awhile, and now he has some other options to pay back that big loan he made to his campaign. I assume Chris Hollins is running for re-election – it’s what he’s been saying he’s doing – but he can also be banking some funds for the election after this one.

Of the current Council member, Julian Ramirez and Mario Castillo are in a strong position to start off 2027. Alejandra Salinas had to spend a bunch of money to win her runoff, but I expect she’ll get her numbers up with no trouble. Tiffany Thomas and Martha Castex-Tatum are term limited, so the question is whether they’ll be looking at other opportunities in 2028, or if they’ll go the David Robinson/Mike Laster route and keep filing mostly similar reports until the end of time.

For the non-incumbents, 2023 candidate Leah Wolfthal has given herself a good head start. I think every first time At Large candidate overestimates their name recognition and the amount of money it takes to move the needle on that. Bradley Mushinski lists former CM Mike Knox as his campaign treasurer, so now you know. Bryan Smart and Rashad Cave have all run for Council before. Anthony Collier is a former Council staffer and current Director of Elections for the Harris County Democratic Party.

Former candidates/officeholders can use their treasury to run for another office, and they can make donations to other candidates or PACs, or to charities. Audrey Nath’s report is a Final report – this doesn’t mean she can’t run for a city office again, just that she’d start anew – and she donated a lot of her remaining cash to various Democratic incumbents, candidates, and affiliated groups. The late Sylvester Turner gave $95K to the Greater North Houston Youth Alliance. If that’s the route his finance manager is taking, I expect to see more like that in January.

We’ll finish up with Senate and Congress next. Let me know what you think.

Posted in Election 2025, Election 2026, Election 2027 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

TEA isn’t done with HISD and its special ed changes

Gonna keep escalating, I guess.

The Texas Education Agency has ordered Houston ISD’s state conservators to review its plans for 5,000 special education students, highlighting tensions over the treatment of students with disabilities in the state’s largest district.

The district has announced plans to consolidate special education services in fewer school campuses. But in a July 7 letter obtained by the Chronicle, the state agency told HISD to review thousands of students’ individualized education programs and meet with families before reassigning students.

If HISD does not take all corrective action by Oct. 9, it could face state sanctions, the TEA said.

In response, HISD said it was already reviewing student learning plans and would schedule meetings with parents, as needed, during the 2026-27 year — contradicting TEA’s order. Special education experts have said the conversations with parents should happen before such changes are made.

[…]

“Recent public reporting has raised significant concerns regarding Houston ISD’s Success Program and the potential movement of students with disabilities to different campuses for the 2026–2027 school year,” the state agency said in the letter. “TEA is aware that families have publicly requested that Houston ISD pause implementation of these changes, and the agency is investigating multiple special education complaints related to this matter.”

In the letter, TEA acknowledged that school districts have the authority to move students in special education programs to different campuses. But since specific campus assignments are often written into students’ individualized education plans, the district should consult with parents before making such moves, the agency said.

The district should also consider the potential harmful effects of reassigning students with special needs, especially if a new campus is further from home, the TEA said.

See here and here for the most recent updates. I really don’t know what to make of this. HISD has already been taken over – fixing its special ed program was a part of the reason for the takeover, though that’s often overlooked – and the district has had a TEA-appointed conservator overseeing its special ed program since 2020. I have no idea where the TEA can go from here if HISD continues with its “no, we’re fine, leave us alone” stance. One could argue that the next logical step, if the TEA still believes HISD is shining it on, would be to threaten to replace Mike Miles, whom the TEA appointed in the first place. Is that even a viable possibility? Again, I have no idea. This has the feel to me of a parent making increasing threats of punishment to its recalcitrant child, with both the child and the parent knowing that it’s a bluff because the threats are not credible. (Ask me how I know what this feeling is.) It usually doesn’t end well for the supposed authority figure. Maybe this time will be different.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A broader look at AI and schools

Good discussion.

Many other states have also been trying to create AI policies for schools. Lawmakers filed more than 134 bills across 31 states this year related to AI in education, focusing on data privacy, usage restriction in the classroom, literacy and training, according to MultiState, a government relations firm.

A survey by the Center for Democracy & Technology showed that a large majority of teachers (85%) reported using AI in their classroom during the 2024-25 school year, while 86% of students said they’d used AI for either personal or school-related reasons. But only about half of teachers and students reported that they received some training or information about AI from someone at their school, and few received training or information on risks of AI use.

A turning point for schools came with the rollout of ChatGPT in 2022, said Noelle Ellerson Ng, chief advocacy and governance officer for the School Superintendents Association. “AI was something that could not be gatekept,” said Ellerson Ng. “It was in the classroom the minute students were able to access it.”

Her association does not take positions on state AI bills or policies. But she said districts are trying to avoid knee-jerk, reactive policies such as New York City’s brief 2022 ban of ChatGPT because of fears about cheating.

[…]

Yet even as schools are being sold on AI products by numerous vendors, there’s a growing skepticism about AI in classrooms. It follows a similar backlash about social media and digital technology’s academic and mental health effects on students, which has led to more states and districts putting in place cellphone bans and rethinking their reliance on laptops.

In the Center for Democracy & Technology survey, half of students said using AI in class made them feel less connected to their teachers, and 70% of teachers said they were concerned that students’ use of AI was preventing them from learning important skills.

Schools need to weigh the benefits of adopting AI tools in the classroom against their effect on student privacy, mental health and social skills, said Sue Thotz, director of outreach for Common Sense Media, a nonprofit advocacy group focused on technology and its effect on children and families.

Schools, Thotz said, may be the “only mandated safe space” where students can learn to use and access emerging technology. But she and other education experts believe districts need to increase scrutiny of products.

Globally, the market for AI products in K-12 schools was worth around $391.2 million in 2024, and could rise to more than $9 billion by 2034, according to market.us, a market research company. That includes AI products for tutoring, personalized learning, automated grading, lesson planning and administrative tasks.

“When I talk about AI literacy, it’s not how to use AI. It’s understanding how AI is built,” said Thotz. “Why is it being created? Who’s profiting off of this?”

[…]

Sophia Romee, the general manager of the GenAI Studio, an initiative studying how students and educators use generative AI at the College Board, the nonprofit that administers the Advanced Placement curriculum and SAT tests for high schools, said she is concerned that only about 1 in 5 districts that allow students to use generative AI have a formal policy governing its use.

The College Board’s research, Romee said, shows many students are worried about becoming too reliant on AI, and that adults need to give clearer guidance about where using AI tools for brainstorming, revising and tutoring crosses the ethical line into cheating.

“Students are far more self-aware about AI’s risks than headlines suggest.”

Jason Coley, director of the Center for Academic Innovation at Maria College in Albany, New York, said the policy debate needs to move beyond whether schools are “for” or “against” the use of AI.

“The better question is what kinds of AI use are supervised, age appropriate, transparent, and tied to real learning,” Coley said. Schools need guardrails around privacy, student data, bias, teacher training and equity of access, he said, but also permission to “experiment responsibly.”

Ellerson Ng, of the School Superintendents Association, said superintendents see AI as part of a larger umbrella of disruptive technologies in schools that has evolved from calculators to laptops to cellphones. The lesson, she said, is that overreactive policy rarely works. She also said schools should not cover AI in a separate policy, but as part of a broader technology policy.

“I don’t have a calculator policy. Why would I have an AI policy?” she said, describing how some district leaders think about the issue. “I have a technology policy.”

With past technologies such as cellphones and laptops, adults could often control when students had access, Ellerson Ng said. With AI apps and platforms, many students accessed the tools before teachers, principals or state officials were even aware of them.

That makes bans difficult, she said. Schools can block tools on school-owned devices and networks, but “you’re only one personal device away from social media and AI being in your schools.”

Justin Reich, an associate professor of digital media at MIT, said that uncertainty around AI should make policymakers cautious about declaring best practices too soon.

Reich said states are trying to regulate classroom AI at a moment when the field is still so unstable that “writing a guide for AI in 2026 is like writing a guide for aviation in 1905” before airlines, airports or even commercial flight.

“If you were to take any of the AI literacy documents, AI readiness documents, even the moratorium documents, and put them against a checklist,” said Reich, “there would be a lot of boxes in the ‘we’re making this up’ column and not a lot in the ‘we have evidence’ column.”

The article centers on state efforts to Do Something about AI in schools, so read the whole thing for some examples of legislation. I can say that as someone who has taken many mandated corporate AI trainings, the comparison to aviation in the 1900s is spot on – pretty much every module will say that whatever they’re saying now will soon be obsolete because the tech is moving so fast. That, and the lack of academic research on the effectiveness of AI in the classroom are good arguments for remaining old school, at least for now. Anyway, go read the rest.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Weekend link dump for July 26

“Can Trump Steal the Midterms? Six Takeaways from Our Election Investigation”. (Short answer: There are things he can do but he’s more limited than he would like, and there are things we all can do to stop him.)

“I don’t trust a customs official to know how people look different at different stages of pregnancy.”

“This Maine Lawsuit is Testing the Boundaries of Suing Federal Immigration Agents”.

“These Are the Worst ChatGPT Flyers You’ve Sent Us”.

“Once schools are open and accepting tax funds, few states then regulate what is taught, what qualifications employees should have or what funds may be spent on. But it’s not just the oversight that private schools get to avoid. They also are free to adopt policies — such as discriminatory admissions — that public schools cannot.”

“Trump’s Attacks on Elections Began with a Lost Emmy“. Some people really needed to listen to what Hillary Clinton was saying in 2016.

“The Blueprint to Save America’s Moms”.

“Elizabeth Warren And Other Democratic Lawmakers Warn Of Antitrust Issues With Fox-Roku Merger”.

The People Own the Constitution, Not the Court”.

“The Kleptocrat Nesting Dolls Behind Trump’s Potemkin Gas Stations”.

RIP, Sylvia Bugg, PBS’ Chief Programming Executive and General Manager for General Audience Programming.

“A hell of a lot of people owe [Courtney] Stodden a hundred apologies.”

“ISBNdb explains that printed books published before 2022 are ideal for AI training data because they don’t include AI generated text.”

“The push to exclude trans girls from girls’ sports has never really been about transgender athletes. There’s a much bigger gender war that they are fighting about inherent, fixed biological difference.”

“France banned children under 15 from using social media on Tuesday, becoming the first country in the European Union to pass a blanket ban on the platforms as concerns grow worldwide over the harmful effects of digital content on kids.”

“A dinosaur’s value, like a painting’s or sculpture’s, derives from a protean mix of provenance, desire and authenticity—the last one hard to define, let alone prove, and in the case of an auction, up to the buyer to verify.”

“Without so much as a wave of his flipper, Neil the boisterous young elephant seal departed Tasmania this week, leaving behind a legion of fans – and questions about what happens when he gets even bigger.” Godspeed, Neil, see you next time.

Let the Muppets perform the Super Bowl halftime show, you cowards.

“OpenAI has revealed some of its most advanced AI models went rogue and hacked a start-up after it lost control of them during a security test.”

“A federal magistrate judge ruled Tuesday that President Donald Trump must turn over detailed financial information in connection with his defamation lawsuit against the BBC.”

RIP, Plas Johnson, saxophonist best known for his part in the iconic theme song to the movie The Pink Panther.

RIP, Dixon Dern, longtime Hollywood attorney who helped shape modern entertainment law.

RIP, Ruby Kless Sondock, legal trailblazer who was the first woman to serve on the Texas Supreme Court.

“Therein lies the brilliance of the film’s closing moments. What has been proved since its release, in the wake of #MeToo, is that no matter the degree of degradation, no matter how fundamentally disgraced an offender might be, the canceled figures in our midst have not been put to death. Whole decades still stretch out before us. Through hubris and inertia, these figures will reappear again and again, in ways that are distressing, shameful, or uncanny, because these days, nobody is deplatformed forever. There is all the incentive in the world for a silenced star to speak into the void once more—all it will cost them is their dignity.”

RIP, Kaylee Hottle, deaf actor who played the character of Jia in two Godzilla vs. Kong franchise movies.

RIP, James Means, Jr, UT Athletics Hall of Honor track star, the first Black athlete to compete in the Southwest Conference. He’s got an amazing story, click over and read it.

RIP, Hannah Rapp, boxer who worked as a fire and life safety inspector at Texas A&M University, killed in a road rage incident while bicycling.

“To Block Renewable Energy Projects, Texas Republicans Have Weaponized Conservation Concerns”.

RIP, Chris Anne Affleck, school teacher, civil rights activist, Freedom Rider, mother of Ben and Casey Affleck.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 1 Comment

Lorenzo Salgado Araujo’s van did not contain drugs

ICE lies about everything.

A substance found in Lorenzo Salgado Araujo‘s van last week was not methamphetamine, multiple officials said Friday afternoon.

U.S. Rep. Sylvia Garcia said she could confirm “the substance found in Lorenzo Salgado’s van was not a narcotic or any other illicit substance” in a statement posted on social media.

“As his family has said all along, this was an electrolyte powder to stay hydrated working outside in the hot Texas summer,” Garcia wrote. “The attempt to cast a shadow over Lorenzo Salgado’s name has failed.”

A spokesperson for Harris County District Attorney Sean Teare’s office said it had been notified that the contents of the plastic baggies were negative for narcotics or other illicit drugs. The spokesperson declined to comment on other details about the findings, including what agency notified Teare’s office.

A lawyer for Victor Salgado Araujo, a witness to the shooting and Lorenzo Salgado’s brother, said that the Texas Department of Public Safety conducted testing on the substance and that official results were expected to be announced Monday.

“The preliminary report is already clear: the substance was not a controlled substance,” attorney Ruby Powers said.

[…]

The Justice Department last week unsealed a search warrant that showed FBI agents sought a judge’s permission to seize and test small plastic baggies that were sitting on the dashboard and floor of Salgado’s Ford Transit van. An agent wrote in a search warrant that the baggies appeared to contain a white, crystal-like substance that was consistent with methamphetamine.

The warrant was unusual for its public release. Most warrants filed in the Southern District of Texas remain sealed during ongoing investigations where there has been no indictment.

Critics of the Justice Department claimed the release was an attempt to smear Salgado’s name in the aftermath of the shooting. The day after the warrant became public his family said they believed the substance in the baggies was salt that was used in homemade electrolyte mixture.

“An unproven claim was allowed to circulate before it was tested, and the way it was made public did real damage, diverting attention from what actually matters in this case,” Powers said. “Lorenzo was shot, and no lab report answers for that.”

See here for all previous blogging on this topic. I wrote about this specific thing somewhere in there, but as I mostly have to do roundups because there’s so many stories, I didn’t look for the specific post. But look, ICE has lied about everything, so there’s not that much to be said here beyond restating that plain fact.

Here’s more on the hearing on Friday about Lorenzo Salgado Araujo and the current state of ICE.

Democratic members of Houston’s Congressional delegation called for a major overhaul of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s tactics and cautioned that immigrants are being “hunted down” during an oversight forum Friday.

The panel was spearheaded by U.S. Rep. Sylvia Garcia, D-Houston, in the aftermath of the July 7 fatal shooting by ICE agents of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a Mexican immigrant and small business owner from Houston’s East End.

Garcia was joined by Houston Democrats Lizzie Fletcher, Al Green and Christian Menefee; U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-San Antonio; U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., the ranking member of the U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security, and U.S. Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-NY, the chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, among others.

[…]

[Harris County District Attorney Sean] Teare criticized the continued detention of three witnesses to the July 7 shooting — Salgado’s brother and two workers who rode in the van.

“They’re the only witnesses we have,” Teare said.

Already, Teare’s investigators have interviewed one of the work van’s occupants.

He cautioned that further interviews are not conducive to privacy amid a guarded investigation. The witnesses may not speak freely while in immigration detention as the rooms are not intended for privileged conversations with lawyers — unlike at the Harris County Jail, which has rooms for defendants to speak with their attorneys without being recorded by authorities.

“We don’t know who’s listening when they give witness statements,” Teare testified.

Teare told lawmakers that he has repeatedly reached out to the DHS to no avail.

“We haven’t gotten a response to anything,” Teare said.

[…]

Aside from the Salgado case, Teare said ICE’s street tactics are hindering his office’s ability to investigate major crimes in Harris County.

“Those of us in law enforcement don’t take issue with deporting violent felons. However, here in Harris County, there are crimes and cases my office has not been able to prosecute because witnesses are scared of immigration consequences,” he said.

Teare added that a witness in an unrelated capital murder case was on a plane to Central America before his office was able to intervene and keep the person in Texas. Teare declined to tell lawmakers which case that was, but in the past, the district attorney has publicly said the father of an 11-year-old Pasadena girl who was raped and killed in 2023 was deported to El Salvador following his misdemeanor arrest. Teare’s office intervened to bring the father back to Texas as a material witness for the accused assailant’s death penalty trial.

Teare said the uncertainty has had a significant impact on the office’s ability to investigate cases of domestic violence.

“They refuse to come forward or testify for fear of being deported,” he said. “What’s happening isn’t helping public safety. It’s certainly not justice. And it’s un-American.”

[…]

Castro later piled on.

“They said that (Salgado) was not their target. That’s because everyone is their target,” he said. “Everyone who is brown, who is speaking Spanish in public. Donald Trump’s campaign of mass deportation is an assault on the Hispanic community in the United States of America.”

Castro then took aim at the governor’s office for demanding local authorities work with ICE.

“Let us also remember that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is a full partner in that brutality,” he said. “We see it on the streets and behind the prison walls of places like Dilly and Pearsall and Karnes in those detention centers. Gov. Abbott has forced state and local law enforcement to assist ICE despite its reckless brutality. No identification, no warrants, full masks and guns drawn.”

Amen to that. Greg Abbott and the rest of the Republican state leadership co-own all of this. We need to harp on that every chance we get, and from there make the point that they own everything that’s wrong in Texas right now because they’ve been in charge for 25+ years. There’s a story about the hearing from Friday morning here if you want more.

And the Republicans who aren’t in office but would like to be are not and will not be any better.

If she wins her race in November, GOP congressional nominee Alex Mealer will represent Houston’s Magnolia Park, the site where Lorenzo Salgado Araujo was fatally shot by a federal immigration agent earlier this month, potentially bringing the area under different partisan representation mere months after it took center stage in the nation’s immigration debate.

In an interview this week, Mealer addressed the shooting in detail for the first time, expressing full confidence that ongoing investigations by the Texas Department of Public Safety, FBI and Houston police will produce a “fulsome accounting” of what happened.

“Any time there’s a loss of life, that is obviously a profound tragedy,” Mealer said, adding that she has been in touch with the FBI’s Houston field office. She acknowledged “the one issue that I think everyone will agree upon” is the need to outfit agents with body cameras, which none of the officers were wearing.

But she otherwise preached patience to let authorities’ fact-finding unfold, drawing on her Army background to argue that incomplete information can distort early conclusions about incidents where someone is gunned down.

“I think we need to see what comes out of those [investigations], because from being in the military as well, things go wrong,” she said. “You look at something from one lens, you’re missing feedback. So, I support the calls for investigation. Speculating to me is not a helpful, productive path forward.”

Mealer’s comments about the July 7 shooting were her first since she posted on social media that same day, calling the incident “yet another reminder of the dangers law enforcement face” while voicing confidence that investigators would “ensure justice is served.” Her more circumspect approach stands in sharp contrast to the assertive response from U.S. Rep. Sylvia Garcia, the Democrat who currently represents much of Houston’s predominantly Hispanic East End, including Magnolia Park.

The neighborhood is among the East End territory being shifted into a new red-leaning seat, which Mealer hopes to represent, under the new congressional map approved by Texas Republicans last summer.

Garcia, a longtime and ardent critic of President Donald Trump’s border agenda, moved aggressively to fill the information vacuum in the days after the shooting, pressing federal officials for answers as Immigration and Customs Enforcement remained initially tight-lipped.

[…]

Asked what she would do differently if she was in Congress when the shooting occurred, Mealer said she hasn’t “heard a specific action item at this point that isn’t already happening” beyond the push for cameras. And she insisted that it would not be prudent to rush to judgment before the full picture emerges.

“With these issues, you want it to be based on facts that happened, not turned into partisan talking points,” she said. “Once we see the results of the investigation, then [we] can see — were there other safeguards, or was this just a tragedy?”

One of these people demands to know what happened and will work to make positive changes and hold the responsible parties to account. It ain’t Alex Mealer. I wish this story had at least named Leticia Gutierrez as Mealer’s opponent – one might get the impression Mealer is seeking to oust Rep. Garcia – but since it didn’t I will. Here’s the interview I did with Gutierrez for the primary if you need a reminder about her. This is a winnable race, if she can get enough resources to run it properly. See also this Chron editorial and this op-ed from Commissioner Adrian Garcia. The Trib and Houston Public Media have more.

Posted in La Migra | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The sleeper problem

This is both hilarious and annoying.

Waking up in a Waymo comes as a shock.

Ditto Kasendar remembers soft music drifting from the robotaxi’s speakers as he rode home late at night from a friend’s birthday party last year. The next moment, Los Angeles firefighters were opening the door and asking if he was OK.

His six-minute trip had ended nearly an hour before. A remote Waymo assistant, dialing in through the car’s speakers, repeatedly tried to rouse him and finally called 911 when he wouldn’t stir.

“I was like, ‘Oh my god, what happened?’” said Kasendar, 30, an interior designer.

Kasendar’s robocab nap was, unfortunately, not an isolated incident.

As companies like Alphabet Inc. and Tesla Inc. bring self-driving taxis to more cities, the messier aspects of serving unpredictable humans are becoming harder to ignore. Passengers are falling asleep, spilling drinks, dropping food, vomiting, experiencing medical emergencies and, in at least two instances, giving birth in the cars. They stumble out of the vehicles and forget to close the doors, forcing the operators to pay nearby gig workers to do it.

These seemingly minor nuisances are becoming a drain on municipal resources and complicating the rollout of robotaxi service.

So many robotaxi customers have nodded off in the midst of a ride that Austin police and firefighters even have a name for the incidents: “sleepers.” The Texas capital recorded 99 such calls in Waymo’s first nine months of service there, said Roger Patterson, a commander with Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services.

If tired or wasted passengers fall asleep in a traditional taxi or rideshare, the driver can shout or shake them awake. Not so in a robotaxi. Remote assistants monitoring the cars try talking through the speakers and checking on passengers with interior cameras. But if they get no response, company protocols often require them to call 911. And first responders have to assume the worst.

Austin dispatchers treat an incident as a potential heart attack if the remote assistant can’t tell whether the passenger is breathing, Patterson said. In the end, only about 3% of such calls require taking the passenger to a hospital, he said. But the incidents tie up personnel who might be needed elsewhere.

“We don’t want to commit a significant number of resources to these calls when, statistically, we know that most of the time, these people do not need further medical treatment,” Patterson told an Austin City Council meeting in April. “These calls are very resource-heavy.”

[…]

Tom Dwiggins, fire chief of a Phoenix suburb served by Waymo, said the companies need to standardize their procedures so first responders won’t have to guess how to immobilize vehicles, open car doors and contact remote assistants in an emergency.

“We would love to see one standard approach across the board,” said Dwiggins, with the Chandler, Ariz., fire department. “If you expect a firefighter in a four-minute response to look up research, try to figure out which vehicle it is, what type of platform it’s on, what company — that’s not going to happen.”

The issue of gross humans creating biohazards in these unsupervised vehicles has come up before. I think the robotaxi companies have figured out a few things since then, but you should keep in mind that there’s always a game of chance with them. The bigger issue is the sleepers, though we don’t have any firm numbers outside of Austin. I think Fire Chief Dwiggins has the right idea, and the way to achieve it is simple enough: A federal law or regulation that mandates a standard approach across the industry, which can then be easily documented for and implemented by every emergency service around the country. And we all know, that ain’t happening under this administration. I can’t say it would be a top priority for the next Democratic trifecta – Lord knows, they will have their hands full – but it’s at least something one could push for. Until then, if you must ride in one of these things, please try to stay awake. The EMS crew that will not be sent to wake you up at your destination thanks you.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Is there a built-in exception to Dobbs?

Fascinating.

[Recently], an Idaho doctor challenging vague exceptions in the state’s abortion ban testified at the start of a major trial that will test a surprising question: Four years after the fall of Roe v. Wade, is there actually some right to abortion that the federal Constitution still protects?

The plaintiff in the case, Stacy Seyb, practiced medicine at St. Luke’s Hospital in Boise for more than 20 years before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. He specializes in treating high-risk pregnancies, from cases of eclampsia, hypertension, or gestational diabetes to patients with multiple fetuses. But under Idaho law, any physician who acts to “cause the death of the unborn child” violates the law, even when providing emergency care to patients with desperately wanted pregnancies.

To an extent that few, if any, contemplated, the court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has put the burden of Roe’s reversal on Seyb’s patients—patients seeking to bear children. While many women have circumvented abortion bans by utilizing telehealth options and abortion pills, those bans have inflicted harms on women seeking to bear children that cannot be so easily evaded. Physicians treating patients with wanted pregnancies and serious complications are chilled by the threat of criminal prosecution. That has led to a lower quality of care for miscarrying patients, pregnant women being denied treatment for cancer, and women in labor being turned away from emergency rooms or being airlifted out of state. Problems of this very kind led Dr. Seyb to ask whether the Constitution—even in the wake of Dobbs—provides protection to physicians and their patients when state criminal law jeopardized a pregnant woman’s life or health.

Lawyers for Seyb and other plaintiffs in the Idaho case emphasize that Dobbs does not appear to be a barrier to advancing these constitutional claims. The question that the Supreme Court answered in 2022 was whether “all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional.” In focusing on elective abortion procedures, the court didn’t address all procedures for terminating a pregnancy.

[…]

In May 2024, Seyb filed a federal lawsuit arguing that the federal Constitution protects a right to abortion when a patient faces “serious medical risks or the pregnancy is medically futile.” Idaho tried to have the case thrown out. The state pointed to Dobbs, which held that any right not enumerated in the Constitution had to be deeply rooted in the nation’s history and tradition. Dobbs said the right to abortion failed this test, Idaho argued, demonstrating Seyb had no case.

In a decision last February, though, District Judge Lynn Winmill disagreed, speaking about doctors’ rights and women’s rights in the language of self-defense. The judge emphasized that Dobbs focused on a right to elective abortion, while Seyb’s case “tests how far Idaho may go when a woman’s pregnancy severely endangers her health.” The case was not about “the general right to abortion,” he explained, “but the right to self-preservation.”

Dobbs analyzed the question of abortion under a history-and-tradition standard.  Judge Winmill observed that the nation’s history and traditions recognized “a right to self-protection and self-preservation” permitting otherwise unlawful acts “when necessary to prevent harm to oneself or another.” The judge then asked whether it “historically encompassed the right to medically indicated abortions” and found “weighty evidence of a historical right to an abortion when necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman,” and considerable evidence of state practice extending that tradition to the protection of her health as well.

Here, the judge suggested there was precedent for the right to self-defense covering “injuries to life or limb.” He noted that Idaho was not providing pregnant women the protections the right of self-defense provided in other contexts; consider a gun fight. He drew this blunt comparison: “Normally, a person has the right to kill another person who means to do grave harm. … In Idaho, however, pregnant women must endure all manner of injuries short of death to avoid compromising the potential life they carry.”

There’s more, so read the rest. The language of “self-defense” is both clever and breathtaking, since I cannot imagine ever using it in a medical context before, let alone an obstetric one. For obvious reasons, a favorable ruling here would have a significant effect on Texas as well. I have no idea what this SCOTUS will make of this argument, but as the authors say, it will tell us a lot about their thinking.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

More funds to pay back that loan

Hrmph.

Candidates seeking office at Houston City Hall will now face no limits on using campaign funds to repay themselves for loans they make to their own campaign accounts.

The change was initiated by Council Member Edward Pollard, who has long been rumored to be running for mayor – and who has loaned more than $1 million to his campaign account. The mayor, controller and all 16 council seats will be on the ballot next year.

Previously, the mayor, controller and at-large council members could repay themselves no more than $75,000 and district council members no more than $50,000. The new policy, approved unanimously without discussion during Wednesday’s council meeting, removes those caps.

Pollard would in theory be able to use campaign contributions to fully recoup the $1,040,000 he has loaned his campaign. Pollard said that having cash in politics was simply the way of the game.

“If someone has the thought to possibly run for office, they have to either raise a lot of money, or they have to loan themselves a lot of money,” Pollard said. “There’s only two things you can do.”

The District J council member did not say which office he might seek when his term as a council member ends next year.

Pollard has noted the change aligns the city with a 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling on campaign loans.

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz in 2019 sued the Federal Election Commission, claiming a law prohibiting candidates from repaying themselves more than $250,000 in campaign loans violated the First Amendment. The justices ultimately ruled repayment limits unconstitutional.

I don’t care for this – if nothing else, there was no need to take this action now, not when no one has filed a lawsuit over the city’s current ordinance – but I’m not sure it makes that much difference. The kind of person that can loan their campaign that kind of money likely doesn’t really need it to be paid back. I’m sure they’d prefer it, but it’s not a need-to-have. Plus, you actually have to win the race to be in a position to fundraise out of the loan, and there’s no guarantee of that. It’s not great and it is an advantage for wealthier candidates, but they’re already at an advantage. I’m not convinced this moves the ball that much. Ask me again in a decade or so and we’ll see how foolish I look for saying that.

(Also, Pollard is obviously running for Mayor. Come on.)

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

US sets new measles record

Congratulations. Let’s send RFK Jr a cake made of beef tallow and cyclospora to celebrate.

The United States has now recorded more cases of measles in 2026 than in any other year since the virus was declared eliminated in 2000, a grim sign that the country may be headed toward a new era in which the disease regularly sickens thousands every year.

On Friday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced that there have been 2,318 confirmed cases of measles so far this year. The case count toppled the record set last year, when measles infected more than 2,200 Americans and killed two unvaccinated children. More measles cases have been reported in the United States in the last two years than in all the years from 2000 through 2024 combined.

Reversing course on measles would require a nationwide push to improve vaccination rates, a prospect that experts said seemed unlikely under the leadership of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He has halted funding for vaccine hesitancy research, downplayed the risks of measles and spearheaded a hunt for evidence that vaccines are unsafe.

In November, a panel of international experts will meet to determine whether the United States has lost its elimination status, which has long been viewed as one of the country’s crowning public health achievements.

“This is just going to keep happening,” said Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at the Brown University School of Public Health. “It’s going to mean living in a perpetual state of vulnerability and risk until we get vaccination levels up.”

Many of the cases reported this year were tied to a large outbreak in South Carolina that took root last October in a close-knit, evangelical Slavic community and quickly became the largest outbreak in the United States since 2000. The outbreak, which ultimately sickened nearly 1,000 people, was declared over by state health officials in April.

Still, the virus is far from contained. Utah is fighting an outbreak that began along its border with Arizona last summer and has led to more than 700 cases, spread across every jurisdiction in the state. Virginia health officials have reported more than 170 cases from an outbreak that began in mid-May. Pennsylvania is grappling with an outbreak that has sickened more than 100 people this year.

In total, the C.D.C. has reported 35 new measles outbreaks this year. A vast majority of cases have been in people who were unvaccinated or whose vaccine status was unknown.

Not a surprise, unfortunately, and other outbreaks are sure to follow, as vaxx rates keep declining. There’s really not much for me to say, so let me round up a few other stories.

From NBC News:

New measles outbreaks are popping up in ArizonaDelaware and Wyoming. The Pennsylvania Health Department is reporting 132 cases, with 27 diagnosed in the past week alone.

Virginia’s outbreak that took off in May appears to be slowing. The state has logged 177 cases, but hasn’t reported any new ones since July 4.

Piedmont Health District, located in central Virginia, has accounted for the majority of that state’s cases. The district health director, Dr. Maria Almond, said her staff has painstakingly gone door to door, encouraging vaccinations to stop the outbreak.

“We go into homes, we listen to their needs, we educate, and we continue to monitor those families and revisit them because they are reluctant to engage in medical care until they are ready and feel safe,” Almond said. “Very often, we are able to link families with care resources.”

The CDC has sent staffers to help with outbreaks in several states, including Virginia. The federal health response to ongoing measles outbreaks, however, has been minimal. The CDC has been without a permanent director for the majority of President Donald Trump’s second term, and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine skeptic, has distanced himself from news of ongoing outbreaks.

“Last year and this year would not be as bad if we had strong, well-funded local public health departments and a CDC that was well-staffed and ready to respond to outbreaks,” said Dr. Adam Ratner, a pediatrician and member of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases.

[…]

But this year’s surge in measles cases has been driven largely by an outbreak that hit the northwest corner of South Carolina, in an area known as the Upstate. Cases began last fall before accelerating wildly just after the Christmas season.

“From the get-go, you’re just thrown into the fire,” said Dr. Stuart Simko, a pediatrician at Prisma Health in Greer, South Carolina. “Measles spreads a lot more rapidly and more efficiently than Covid ever could, and that was the scariest part.”

Simko had never seen a case of measles before the state’s outbreak that ultimately infected 997 people. He said he and his colleagues had to learn to spot a child with measles quickly. “It looks like the flu on steroids,” he said. “They’re covered in a rash, their fever is at 104, 105. They just don’t have any energy.”

While the majority of measles cases have occurred in children and teenagers, Piedmont Health’s Almond said that adults can also get very sick.

“This community’s really felt it in their adults with severe nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and dehydration,” she said. “It is terrible and severe.”

There isn’t a circle of hell deep enough for RFK Jr. I hope someone is figuring out what criminal charges he could be arrested for in 2029.

From CNN:

South Carolina has reported more measles cases in 2026 than any other state. An outbreak started raging across Spartanburg County in October; it would become the largest the largest the US has seen in decades, with nearly 1,000 cases, before ending in April this year.

Geographically speaking, the Rev. Scott Neely’s Unitarian Universalist Church of Spartanburg was right in the center of the outbreak.

He said he felt insulated from it at first, but on the first Friday of 2026 – the day after New Year’s Day – the state health department reached out because there had been a connection: Contact tracing work showed that someone with measles had attended the church’s annual Christmas brunch, potentially exposing dozens of people who were there.

“This was a strange experience of how segmented our society is,” he said. “An outbreak was garnering national attention right where I live but having almost no immediate impact on me. That’s not about lack of care or lack of awareness. It is about a kind of separation, isolation, and the way that we’re all living.”

The South Carolina Department of Public Health asked for a list of all the people who were at the brunch so its workers could continue their investigation, following the chain of exposures to hopefully get ahead of it and prevent more.

There was no such list, though. The annual Christmas brunch was a potluck led by volunteers from the congregation and open to anyone in the community who might be looking for a place to be on Christmas, Neely said. They didn’t know everyone who attended.

Rapid messages were sent between leadership and staff, and within a few hours, someone shared a photo they had taken of the room. It took a full team effort to help identify people in the photo and collect contact information to share back to the health department — a frantic race against one of the most contagious diseases known to humans began.

Neely said he didn’t hear any more from the state health department; transmission didn’t seem to have spread beyond that one instance, which he attributes to the very high vaccination rate within the congregation.

“There were nerves, and there was anxiety, and there was some disagreement, but the concluding story was vaccinations work and cooperative spirit gets us very far,” he said. “But also it really brought to our immediate attention that this is in our community, it’s all around us, and we don’t know what’s going to happen.”

[…]

In South Carolina, Neely knew that the “vast majority” of his congregation was vaccinated. But after the scramble in January, they wanted to become actively involved in the response and started hosting mobile vaccination clinics.

“I’m not sure we were able to quantify what the actual impact of what we did was. I don’t know that it would be a significant numerical impact,” Neely said. “It’s a story of a community that was trying to figure out what to do in real time and people who are very willing to work together to try to do it.”

I’d support Rev. Neely as the next HHS Secretary. At least he wants to do right and inspires the same in others.

And from KFF Health News, conversations with doctors in Utah fighting the outbreak there.

On Unvaccinated Children Hospitalized With Measles Complications

Emilie Morris, a hospital pediatrician in Salt Lake County and Utah County: When children come in, they’re often bent over. We call it tripoding, which is particular to upper respiratory infections and airway swelling. They have a rash — viruses cause rashes all the time — but in this context, the kid is hunched over, mouth open, drooling, crying, maybe not even producing tears, because they’re so dehydrated. Really labored breathing, kind of tugging in their belly, tugging between their ribs. Their eyes look kind of glazed over. It’s like they’re seeing through you.

Nathan Money, a hospital pediatrician in Salt Lake County and Utah County: If the child has a fever or trouble breathing, and they’re unvaccinated, I have to be way more aggressive from a medical standpoint, because they are at higher risk of having life-threatening illnesses. I have to do more blood work, or lumbar punctures to rule out meningitis. I have to do things which are painful, and it’s traumatic for the families.

I tell them, “Because your child doesn’t have vaccines, I have to be more worried about conditions like sepsis or meningitis, so therefore I need to do more workup.” The last thing I want to do is miss something. These are parents who love their children. They always tell me, “Do what you need to do to make sure my child is safe.”

[…]

On Conversations With Parents Who Don’t Vaccinate Their Children

Tim Duffy, a pediatrician in Salt Lake County: A lot of families aren’t aggressively anti-vax, but they’re hesitant. Younger parents who grew up in the digital age have done their research — “research” in quotation marks — for months. And they keep getting confirmation of their concerns on social media. They think they’re doing what’s best for their child.

I’ve told families: “You could do nothing I say as a pediatrician. You could sleep your child on their stomach. You could not put them in a car seat or, when they’re older, not use seat belts. You could do nothing I say, and for your individual child, they will probably be OK. But from my standpoint, where I’m taking care of thousands of kids, within a system that takes care of hundreds of thousands of kids, we will have bad outcomes. These children will show up at our facilities, and it’s so sad.”

Pediatrician in southern Utah whom KFF Health News agreed not to name, because of concerns about harassment after being targeted by anti-vaccine activists in the past: A lot of parents are concerned about autism. I’ve told them that I’d be very concerned if there was any evidence that what we’re doing is causing autism. But if vaccines were causing autism, we should see more cases of autism in vaccinated kids compared to unvaccinated kids, and we’re just not seeing that.

I’ve also had families who say they want to be natural, or that they’re concerned about what is in the shots. A frequently asked question is: “Did you vaccinate your children?” I say that knowing what I know, I’m confident giving this to my kids. They’re all vaccinated.

[…]

Advice on Talking With Parents Who Don’t Vaccinate Their Children

Jones: Approach them with as much compassion as you possibly can. Ask open-ended questions to learn about their experiences that led them to have these concerns. I think it’s really important to not come down on them, citing facts and figures and pointing to guidelines on why they need to get their kids vaccinated. But try to direct their attention to the fact that you’re a real person with your own real experiences and knowledge. I point out to families that I have my own kids, and I would never recommend something for your kids that I wouldn’t do for mine.

Southern Utah pediatrician: I’ve learned that if you come down hard, you’re going to lose people who need care. My number one goal now is to build bridges and maintain a relationship with families, because that’s what’s going to allow me to convince some of them.

I approach people differently depending on where they are. Parents who are very skeptical or anti-vax will say no when I tell them their child is due for immunizations. I’ll say: “Fine. You guys get to choose. You’re the parents. But I’m curious to know what your reasoning is.” Sometimes they’re just like, “It’s something I’ve decided.” They don’t want to have a conversation.

It’s a good day if I can have a conversation with someone who doesn’t want to vaccinate, even if I don’t convince them. I try to help them think through things rather than shoving anything down their throat. When they’re done talking, I’ll ask, “Can I share my perspectives on this?” Some will say yes enthusiastically, and others will say yes because they’re being polite.

A lot of parents aren’t sure what to do, and those are the people I focus most of my time on. I focus our conversation on their specific concerns, and I’m open about specific side effects that different immunizations can have. For example, I’ll tell them that some children get a fever after a vaccine, which is OK. The fever is not harmful, but it can make babies feel crummy as their body is building up antibodies against viruses and bacteria.

Brownstein: I don’t like the idea of excluding unvaccinated kids from my practice. I know some do that. But what that does is it ends any future discussion. I can’t keep talking with parents about vaccines if I kick them out of my practice, and if these parents find like-minded doctors, this situation will get worse.

Nothing has tested my capacity for compassion like the anti-vaxx movement. I’m glad there are people who have the patience and willingness to talk to the vaccine-hesitant people out there, because I would just Hulk out on them, and I know that would be very bad. God bless these people for taking this on.

Posted in National news | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SMU “studies” the effect of robotaxis on Dallas/Fort Worth traffic

I quibble with the word “study”, but this is still interesting.

Driverless vehicles may reduce congestion in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, according to a new SMU study, although doubts and a variety of concerns regarding safety remain.

Human-monitored, AI-driven vehicles debuted in December with the rollout of an Uber-backed Avride driverless fleet in Dallas. Waymo followed suit in February, launching fully driverless services in an area roughly spanning from University Park to the Bishop Arts District. Since then, critics have pointed to worrying reports of collisions and robotaxis driving through flooded roadways, with Waymo temporarily suspending operations in May after one such instance in San Antonio.

However, advocates for the technology have continued to promote its potential to enhance accessibility and transportation experiences. One area in which driverless cars show promise, according to a new SMU-led study, is relieving congestion. Another study from 2024 found that Dallas is the 17th most congested city in the U.S, with drivers losing an average of 36 hours each year sitting in traffic.

The study was led by researchers from SMU and Texas A&M’s Texas Transportation Institute’s Travel Forecasting Program, with partial funding and traffic modeling provided by the North Texas Council of Governments. Researchers predicted traffic patterns for 2045, considering fully automated, hybrid and partial scenarios.

“Traffic congestion is often driven not only by high demand but also by speed variability and stop-and-go behavior, which reduce flow efficiency,” Kheled Abdelghany, a fellow at SMU’s Stephanie and Hunter Hunt Institute for Engineering and Humanity, said in a release. “Autonomous vehicles may help mitigate these effects through smoother and more coordinated driving.”

For the study, researchers conducted 25 experiments with 100%, 50% and 25% of total 2045 traffic being driverless, all benchmarked against a 0% driverless scenario. In the fully automated scenario, researchers found that traffic delays could fall by up to 33% in DFW. The model also suggested that hours spent in traffic could be cut by at least 19%. However, that model assumes an even more car-centric future for North Texas due to increased transit convenience, with the results hinging on an increasing number of people leaving the core parts of Dallas-Fort Worth for far-flung peripheral communities.

The study also found that while communication between driverless vehicles and traffic lights could slightly reduce delays, the impact was not substantial compared with the predicted improvements on highways and major arterials.

However, there have been doubts about whether driverless vehicles can sustainably free up roadways. An MIT study found that almost half of autonomous vehicle hours are spent without a human in the vehicle, and that public resistance to AVs has lingered with their rollout.

Critics argue that increased convenience will create self-propagating and growing demand for vehicle transit, further clogging roadways. There are also concerns that convenience could lead to further suburban sprawl and “cannibalize” public transportation, with a UC Davis study finding that the growth of AVs and ride-hailing led to an overall decrease in public transit use.

In an area where outer-ring suburbs have grown voraciously at the expense of Dallas County, and the threat of a suburban-led exodus recently seemed poised to endanger the future of DART, these concerns may be especially salient.

As noted before, we’ve been talking about the potential effects of driverless vehicles on road traffic for over a decade. We’ve also discussed their possible effect on mass transit, for which I strongly believe that a fleet of Waymos would be a terrible replacement.

I consider this to be a simulation and not a study, but I’m not going to get bogged down in the semantics. We can make assumptions about different scenarios and see what they might lead to, but I don’t think we have nearly enough data to have any idea what the future will be. And there is an ongoing debate about how much traffic will be – and is being – generated by empty robotaxis, as they wait for their next rider.

Driverless taxis spend just as much time driving around without a passenger as regular taxis, according to a new study — a finding that reveals a major shortcoming for a technology that boosters say will revolutionize transportation forever.

The study in the journal Transport Findings reveals that robotaxis spend roughly 45 percent of their total mileage without passengers — which is so close to regular taxis that one transportation industry expert feels he’s been lied to.

“I’ve been assured by these industry insiders that deadheading would fall to very low levels with robotaxis, but it’s pretty clear that’s not happening,” said David Zipper, a contributing writer at Bloomberg.

The concern is obvious: Commercial robotaxis are on the rise across the United States. According to the study — “Millions of Trips, “Waymo” Empty Miles: California’s First Thousand Days of Commercial Robotaxi Service” — robotaxi prevalence has grown by an average of 15 percent monthly since they were first introduced in August 2023. That 15 percent is consistent across all measures: trips completed, miles traveled and passengers carried.

Now that’s more of a study. The data isn’t set in stone, things can and will change over time. My personal observation is that I see a lot of Waymos and now Nuros around, the latter with safety drivers, but I can’t tell how many of them have passengers – the windows are tinted on the Waymos so I can’t see the back seat. I see some of them before dawn, when I’m doing my morning walks, so I figure at least some of them are empty. Unless their companies buy or build parking lots fo them, or we all follow the Tesla model of individuals owning the robotaxis that get activated when not in use by the owner, they’ve all gotta go somewhere when not in use. I don’t know what that will look like, but surely some of it will involve empty cars aimlessly driving around.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Talarico’s data center plan

Seems perfectly fine.

Rep. James Talarico

Democratic U.S. Senate nominee James Talarico on Wednesday called for a broad set of tighter regulations on data centers in Texas, seizing on what has become a potential political liability for Republicans who until recently had embraced the explosion of artificial intelligence-driven development in the state.

“Texas should be a leader when it comes to innovation and technology, but that only works if Texans get a say and get a share of that economic growth — and that’s not what’s happening right now,” Talarico said at a news conference in Austin where he rolled out his plan. “We’re often told in our politics that we have to choose between policies that are pro-growth and pro-people. I reject that choice, and the plan that we’re outlining today to hold data centers accountable, I think, strikes a balance between welcoming those investments while also protecting working people.”

Talarico’s proposals include:

  • setting minimum federal requirements to protect the grid, environment, jobs and transparency related to new data center development, “preventing a race to the bottom for communities competing to recruit data centers;”
  • ending “sweetheart tax deals for big tech companies” by repealing the state’s data center sales tax exemption;
  • ensuring large energy users pay for their own infrastructure and grid interconnection costs;
  • requiring data centers use closed-loop water systems that reuse a fixed amount of water;
  • granting local communities the authority to approve and reject data center development in their towns;
  • releasing government records detailing individual tax break data for data center facilities in Texas.

Talarico is among several Texas Democrats pushing back on data centers, calling the rapid influx of the facilities in Texas a product of corporate greed and Republican leadership more sympathetic to big business than everyday people.

State Rep. Gina Hinojosa, the Democratic candidate for governor, visited Amarillo and Lubbock over the weekend on a tour focused on rural communities’ concerns about data centers, and she was poised to announce her own data center plan Thursday.

“Data centers are jacking up utility bills across the state of Texas,” Talarico said. “Billionaire-backed politicians are giving sweetheart tax deals to giant AI companies and then sticking us with the bill.”

[…]

Talarico did not call for a moratorium, saying he wanted to support innovation and technology while ensuring local communities had a say in projects looking to build near them. Projects that did not meet “basic guardrails,” he said, should not move ahead.

His plan overlaps significantly with a sweeping regulatory scheme Abbott proposed last month. Abbott later also called for a ban on data center development in “rural neighborhoods.”

See here and here for some background. It’s true that the electricity and water requirements, as well as the repeal of the sales tax exemption, are part of Abbott’s proposal, which the Chron story also noted. But Talarico’s pledge to restore local control in this matter is a vast and significant departure from Abbott, who pandered to “rural neighborhoods” while being responsible for local communities being mostly powerless to exert any control over this kind of development and a lot of other things besides. Abbott hasn’t said anything about henchmen like Sen. Paul Bettencourt threatening local officials who try to take steps to slow down data center construction in response to their constituents. And he sure hasn’t stopped raking in the big bucks from data center interests. So sure, there’s some overlap. But the places where they differ matter a lot more.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

New school finance lawsuit filed

An old familiar tune is being played.

Texas’ byzantine school finance system will face legal scrutiny for the first time in a decade after a rural school board voted to sue the state.

The Midland Independent School District board unanimously greenlit the lawsuit Tuesday night, arguing that the state’s restrictive funding rules unfairly strip the local board of its power to levy property taxes.

The suit, which will be filed in Travis County, sets up the first significant challenge to the system since 2016 and, if successful, could force the state Legislature to rework the system to allow districts to keep more of their local taxes. It comes as lawmakers have struggled in recent years to address voter anger over rising property taxes, with Gov. Greg Abbott going as far as calling for abolishing school taxes entirely for homeowners.

Josh Guinn, the Midland ISD board president who proposed the suit, said he did not know yet whether other districts would join. But the board must act to protect its power, he said.

“I think Midland has paid its fair share in property taxes to the state, and it’s time to challenge it,” Guinn said in an interview ahead of Tuesday’s meeting.

Asked by a fellow board member if the suit was connected to Abbott’s property tax push, Guinn said no.

As the story notes, we’ve gotten a school finance lawsuit roughly once a decade since the 1980s, which is what first led to wealthier school districts kicking over some of their property tax revenue to poorer ones, in the name of equity. There were only a few school districts paying into that system at first, but that number is much larger now and includes districts like HISD that don’t have a lot of cash to spare and smaller ones like Midland that have a lot of oil money.

The new lawsuit specifically targets a 2019 bill passed by the Legislature that shifted power to set property tax rates — and dictate how that money is spent — from school boards to the state’s education commissioner.

For Midland, the commissioner’s rate means it must levy $313 million in property taxes to pay for the district’s daily operations, with $83 million of that sent to the state. The district says it has paid nearly $1 billion to the state over the last decade.

Money collected through recapture is generally redistributed to school districts, but can also be used to generally balance the state budget, including funding for charter schools.

The result leaves local school boards “with control over only a small fraction of their own local property taxes,” read the school district’s proposed complaint, written by the board’s attorneys.

The suit argues the state’s funding scheme is so restrictive that it amounts to a state property tax, which is prohibited under the Texas Constitution. Past challenges have made similar arguments with mixed results before the Texas Supreme Court.

Guinn said a lot has changed since the court last rejected a challenge to the school funding method in 2016.

“Even with the monies we keep, we have less discretion on how it’s spent now, with mandates and other things,” he said.

I wish them luck, but I don’t have a lot of faith in the current Supreme Court or the current leadership. The lawsuit before the 2016 one was decided in favor of the districts, and what resulted was a mess of one-time payments and other jerry-rigged nonsense that never actually put more money in the districts’ coffers, while vast differences in the per-student appropriations from one district to another remained. The Republicans who have run this state for 25 years refuse to acknowledge that the cost of public education has gone up a lot for reasons beyond the schools’ and districts’ control – legislative mandates, insurance and security costs, a growing and often low-income population, inflation, etc etc etc – while they continue to cut property taxes (which disproportionately benefit corporate interests) and deprive schools of needed funding. I’m sure this lawsuit will highlight all of these problems, as the previous ones also did, but it’s going to take fundamental change in our government to fix any of it.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Appeals court tosses injunction against Maria Rojas

Good.

A Texas appeals court on Thursday tossed out an injunction against a Houston-area midwife accused of providing illegal abortions, saying Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office hasn’t presented any direct evidence that she violated the state’s ban.

The ruling by the all Republican Texas 15th Court of Appeals said a lower court’s decision to temporarily shut down Maria Rojas’ clinics “abused its discretion,” and that the state’s case relied on “probable-cause” affidavits centering on an anonymous email.

“Without the probable-cause affidavits, the remaining evidence in the record does not reasonably support the State’s allegations that abortions have been performed at the Clinics,” Justice Scott Field wrote in his opinion.

Rojas is the first person in the state to stand trial for allegedly violating Texas’ abortion ban, which took effect in 2022. She also faces charges for practicing medicine without a license.

The ruling only applies to the injunction, and Rojas’ case determining if she violated the abortion ban will proceed, along with the cases of eight other people who worked at her clinics and face similar charges.

[…]

The Center for Reproductive Rights, which is representing Rojas, said even without the injunction Rojas won’t likely be able to reopen the clinics, which have been closed for more than a year. Still, they considered the ruling a win, calling it a “significant step towards justice.”

“The state of Texas has no case,” said Jenna Hudson, senior counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights, which is defending Rojas. “Maria Rojas has been an upstanding midwife who delivered babies and provided lawful care for underserved pregnant patients.”

See here for the previous update, and here for the 15th Court’s opinion, which I remind you was written and signed by three Republicans appointed by Greg Abbott. Though it is surely a moot point, I suppose the state could still pursue this injunction against Rojas, but they would have to produce some real evidence in order to get it. Which, maybe they don’t have. I’m sure all of this will feature prominently in the defense’s motion to dismiss all of the charges against Rojas and everyone else who was arrested. That will be for another day. In the meantime, this is indeed a win. A statement from the Center for Reproductive Rights is here, and the Trib has more.

Posted in Crime and Punishment, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Witnesses to Lorenzo Salgado Araujo’s killing document ICE lies

Fuck ICE.

Two passengers in a van when an immigration agent fatally shot 52-year-old Lorenzo Salgado Araujo earlier this month said that two unmarked vehicles struck them from behind and the side before they stopped, according to their written statements filed in a Houston federal court.

“At no moment were the agents in front of the vehicle,” Daniel Tirado Pantoja, a rear passenger in the van, said in his hand-written statement in Spanish. “Lorenzo (Salgado Araujo) had come to a full stop while the agents fired.”

Jose Trinidad Rojas Pliego, who was also in the back seat, wrote in his statement that a patrol vehicle chased them, but Salgado Araujo believed he had lost the unmarked vehicles.

“Out of nowhere, they suddenly cornered us and we told Lorenzo (Salgado Araujo) to stop the van,” Rojas Pliego wrote. “When Lorenzo stopped the van, the officer shot him anyway.”

Shortly after the July 7 shooting in Houston’s heavily Latino east side, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokespeople said an agent fired in self-defense after Salgado Araujo attempted to hit the agent with his vehicle.

But Rojas Pliego said it was “impossible to say that they were going to get run over. That’s a lie — no officer was behind nor in front — they were on the sides.”

Excerpts of the men’s statements have been previously reported by The Washington Post. The full statements in Spanish, along with English translations, became public on Monday when they were attached as exhibits as part of petitions filed by Houston attorney Raed Gonzalez seeking the men’s release from an immigration detention facility in nearby Conroe.

Tirado Pantoja wrote in his statement that one of the ICE vehicles struck the van from behind before the same vehicle struck the van from the side. At some point, presumably after he was shot, Salgado Araujo yelled, “Ya me mataron” — they killed me.

Tirado Pantoja also said that another agent switched guns with the agent who fired his weapon. In his statement, he wrote that an agent fired multiple times.

Rojas Pliego wrote that after Salgado Araujo was shot, an agent violently pulled him out of the van and handcuffed his wrists and ankles on the ground before agents did the same to the three other men.

Salgado Araujo’s brother, who was the front passenger, wrote in his statement that an agent fired once from the passenger side of the van.

“When he shot my brother, the gun was in front of my face,” he wrote, according to attorney Hugo Balderas Ibarra’s account to The Washington Post. The brother’s written statement was not included in the most recent court filings.

It’s too enraging to continue, so read the rest as you see fit. And also fuck Tom Homan and Aaron Reitz, the new AUSA in Texas who’s out there lying about what those asshole agents did.

And then you can read this.

Religious leaders gathered Wednesday at the Texas Capitol to condemn recent ICE-related deaths in Texas, Maine and Florida and to demand that federal immigration agents end a “terror campaign” against migrants.

“We grieve every death, every act of violence, and every enforcement practice that unnecessarily endangers human life or diminishes the God-given dignity of our immigrant neighbors,” said Bishop Sue Briner with the Southwestern Texas Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

“When fear begins to shape the daily lives of our neighbors, it is time for the church to show up,” she said.

A news conference inside the Capitol brought together leaders from the United Methodist Church, the Episcopal Diocese of Texas, the South Central Conference of the United Church of Christ, the National Council of Jewish Women and more. Texas Impact, an interfaith grassroots network, organized the event.

The religious leaders condemned the “grave moral evil” of deportations, detention centers and enforcement-related deaths involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and urged ICE agents and government officials to “examine their conscience.” Those who determine that their actions are immoral should “resign and find other work,” said Jim Harrington, who works with immigrants at St. James Episcopal Church in Austin.

“Following orders is never a justification in the Christian tradition — nor in international law — to perpetuate evil,” Harrington said.

Dan De Leon, senior pastor at Friends Congregational Church in College Station, invoked the Sermon on the Mount. “Jesus says, ‘Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.’ Notice that Jesus does not say, ‘Blessed are the peacekeepers,’ which is what ICE alleges to be doing in our communities,” he said.

Jewish leaders turned to their faith as well: “Jewish tradition teaches that whoever saves a life saves the entire world, and conversely, whoever destroys a life destroys the whole world,” said Bettie Forman with the National Council of Jewish Women.

Amen.

Posted in La Migra | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Of course Paxton got paid in the Sorsby saga

The sun rises in the east, Texas is hot in July, Ken Paxton is for sale, etc etc etc.

Still a crook any way you look

Last month, Attorney General Ken Paxton waded into the explosive college football saga involving Brendan Sorsby, the Texas Tech University quarterback who had admitted to placing thousands of improper sports bets, including on his own team’s games, resulting in the NCAA declaring him ineligible to play.

In a June 11 letter, Paxton’s office warned the Big 12 Conference on behalf of Texas Tech that any move to sanction the university for fielding Sorsby would be “unlawful” and potentially expose it to $200 million in damages.

One day before he sent that letter, Texas Tech Board of Regents Chair Cody Campbell, one of Sorsby’s most public defenders, donated $274,300 to a fundraising committee supporting Paxton in his bid for U.S. Senate, according to campaign finance records newly filed with the Federal Election Committee Wednesday.

Campbell declined to comment on the record for this story. Paxton’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment or to questions about whether Paxton indicated to Campbell that his office would send the letter if he made the donation. Texas Tech also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Campbell, a former Texas Tech lineman who has donated at least $25 million to the school’s athletics program, was appointed to the board of regents in 2021 and became chair in 2025. Throughout Sorsby’s eligibility drama, Campbell and Texas Tech vocally defended his right to playcasting him as a student in recovery from addiction and his situation the “outcome of a broken system.”

Campbell is also a major GOP donor. From 2016 onward, he gave $30,000 to Paxton’s state-level campaigns, and in this year’s Republican U.S. Senate primary, he donated to both Paxton and U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt.

His June 10 donation to Paxton Victory, one of Paxton’s joint fundraising committees, appears to be among his largest contributions over the years. Campbell also previously gave almost $700,000 to Trump 47 Committee Inc. and $500,000 to MAGA Inc., President Donald Trump’s principal super PAC. Campbell gave another $300,000 to Gov. Greg Abbott’s campaign this year.

The same day Paxton sent the letter to the Big 12, Campbell also donated $100,000 to GOP attorney general nominee Mayes Middleton, the Galveston state senator vying to replace Paxton. Campbell supported U.S. Rep. Chip Roy in the primary and runoff, but this donation makes him Middleton’s largest donor in the post-runoff period.

See here for the background. Hey, he got a good price for his services, and he needs the cash, so what else is there to say? It’s the Ken Paxton experience, in one tidy story.

Posted in Election 2026, Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

A brief cyclospora roundup

First we had this.

The Mexican iceberg lettuce linked to an outbreak of cases of explosive diarrhea was distributed in Texas for more than two weeks, according to the company recalling the product across the country.

Lettuce distributed in Texas from June 29 to Thursday may have been contaminated with cyclospora — a diarrhea-inducing parasite blamed for more than 1,600 cases across five states, according to U.S. officials. Patients have tested positive for the parasite in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana and West Virginia, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported 94 related hospitalizations.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration traced the lettuce to an “independent farm” in central Mexico that represents less than 1% of the U.S. lettuce supply, according to Taylor Farms. Texas and 26 other states received the lettuce shipments until last week, according to the company.

The recall extended to Walmart’s Marketside brand, and the rest of the lettuce with potential contamination were food service products, according to Taylor Farms.

Taylor Farms said it stopped receiving product from the affected lot, suspended its distribution, notified customers and began working with the FDA, CDC and state officials. Company officials did not immediately return a request for comment but stressed its attention to the matter in a statement issued Friday.

“As a family owned and operated company, we are deeply concerned for those who became ill, their families, and the many Americans whose trust in the safety of their fresh produce has been shaken,” the statement reads. “That trust is something we’ve worked for decades to earn, and we are committed to doing everything in our power to restore that confidence.”

That seemd to clear things up, but then it got complicated.

The source of the Cyclospora illness outbreak remains unknown, after the Food and Drug Administration announced Sunday that a previous test identifying the parasite in a sample of lettuce from Taylor Farms de Mexico was not actually contaminated with Cyclospora.

The agency reviewed the results and said in a statement it “concluded that the finding does not represent true amplification and should be considered a false positive.”

On social media, however, the FDA clarified that “this false-positive lab sample DOES NOT change the basis for FDA’s ongoing outbreak investigation or the overwhelming epidemiological data supporting the current voluntary recall by Taylor Farms.”

The FDA’s recommendation is still not to eat iceberg lettuce grown or processed by Taylor Farms in Mexico. The products were sold at Taco Bells in five states: Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and West Virginia, and Taco Bell has said it is no longer using that lettuce. Iceberg lettuce products were also distributed in 27 states and Walmart stores in 15 states. Health officials recommend discarding any recalled iceberg lettuce distributed by Taylor Fresh Foods.

That recommendation is based on interviews done with sick people, many of whom had eaten at Taco Bell that included the lettuce.

The FDA is continuing to test lettuce samples and says it’s also testing produce at the southern border to check for Cyclospora. But so far none of this has turned up any positives.

There are now over 1,600 confirmed cases of diarrhea caused by this water- and foodborne parasite and a growing number of suspected cases in the thousands. Ninety-four people have been hospitalized. There have been no deaths reported.

Taylor Farms said in a statement that the FDA apologized, emphasizing that “FDA has not identified a single positive product test result for Cyclospora.” On July 17, the company did voluntarily recall all iceberg lettuce grown and processed in central Mexico and on Monday clarified that it is “no longer sourcing iceberg lettuce grown in central Mexico for the remainder of the growing season” and is working closely with public health officials.

If you’re wondering why this got so confusing, here’s an explanation.

Watching this unfold has been like watching a train wreck. What we are all experiencing is a perfect storm with a few factors colliding:

  1. Cyclosporiasis is a hard-to-investigate parasite. Symptoms can take up to 2 weeks or more. (Can you remember what you ate 12 days ago?) This work is laborious, and confirming it requires specialized lab testing. Often, a source is never identified.
  2. Federal food safety agencies are stretched thin. Neither the FDA nor the CDC has a permanent director right now, and both agencies have lost staff and lab capacity and undergone major reorganizations, some actively happening when the largest outbreak in history occurred. Their centralized role is critical to help stitch together what is happening in the states.
  3. The private company linked to the outbreak is muddying the waters with its PR approach. For example, in the Taylor Farms voluntary recall, they listed customers where this lettuce was sent, but in coded language. Typically, this information would have been shared with lot numbers, source names, and much more clarity on where else this lettuce went, beyond Taco Bell. There have been questions about Taylor Farms linked to this administration and Trump White House officials as well.

What this means for you: If you’re in the 27 states, avoid all shredded iceberg lettuce. If you’re high-risk (pregnant, over 65, or immunocompromised), I would remain careful around produce with crevices (like raspberries) until we are sure there is no cross-contamination happening, too.

And here’s a deeper dive into how this happened and why the last week was so confusing.

Surely the decimation of federal government agencies, among them the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the FDA, factors into why this outbreak remains a mystery. The Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, a collaborative federal-state program led by the CDC, saw its funding drastically cut by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in July 2025, when FoodNet went from surveilling eight pathogens to two, with Cyclospora joining CampylobacterListeriaShigellaVibrio, and Yersinia on the ignored pile.

To use the terminology of the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Kennedy has been throwing away umbrellas in the middle of a storm left and right since he took the helm: Monitoring for measlesscrewwormflu, and Ebola all saw funding cuts. Who needs umbrellas when you’ve got a tanning bed, a chin-up bar, beef-tallow stockpiles, and a gallon of only-sometimes-poisonous raw milk? The CDC and FDA have lost at least 6,000 workers, many arbitrarily, many in crucial positions. Kyle Diamantas, a lawyer with no public health credentials and a hunting buddy of Donald Trump Jr., now leads the FDA, while Jay Bhattacharya, who made a name for himself advocating for herd immunity during the COVID-19 pandemic, leads the CDC.

[…]

Less than 24 hours after the FDA had warned the public about Taco Bell in five states, Taylor Farms quietly issued a recall notice identifying a string of products from its plant in Central Mexico that had been distributed between June 29 and July 16 to 29 U.S. states. The recall notice is remarkable in its opacity, identifying the outlets by internal code names instead of ones the public would recognize (e.g., MARK, rather than Walmart). The FDA’s accompanying announcement was also odd, choosing to pinpoint the supplier as “Taylor Farms de Mexico of Guanajuato, Mexico,” as if to subtly insinuate that the company was Mexican instead of a Californian company operating a plant in Mexico.

Taylor Farms provided more fuel for suspicion after it removed a note from its website that had claimed that “no Taylor Farms–branded salads or kits are associated with this outbreak,” an omission that was caught by Consumer Reports’ Paris Martineau, who pointed to the inclusion of a TF brand in Taylor Farms’ recall notice. Does TF stand for Taylor Farms? Maybe, and perhaps even probably, but who can actually say? Not the public.

According to the New York Times, the very same night the agency was blaming Taco Bell, Taylor Farms executives were meeting with officials from the White House and the FDA “to try and distance the company from the outbreak and air concerns about the official investigations into the outbreak.”

If the obfuscatory messaging and attempts to duck transparency by the seemingly concerted efforts of the FDA and Taylor Farms aren’t yet painting a clear picture, consider also that Taylor Farms (as Taylor Fresh Foods Inc.) donated $1 million to the MAGA Inc. super PAC on March 26, 2025, less than a week after the agency announced that it would delay enforceability of the FTC until 2028. Taylor Farms has donated more than $3.8 million to conservative groups, and CEO and founder Bruce Taylor has personally donated more than $1 million to Republican-aligned PACs over the past two decades.

Then, on Sunday, the story got much stranger when the FDA announced that the sample provided by “Taylor Farms de Mexico,” which had initially tested positive, was actually a false positive. Taylor Farms quickly issued an audacious statement: “Today, FDA apologized to us,” which is not what the agency did. Did the FDA run interference for Taylor Farms? That seems exceedingly likely. Did it confuse the public? Definitely.

Jennifer McEntire, a food safety consultant, assured me that this statement in no way exonerates Taylor Farms, because it “does not change the traceback (combing through supply chain records to reconstruct the path products took in order to see if, when looking at all the places ill people ate, they have a common source) and epidemiology that led the agency to implicate Taylor Farms Mexico facility.”

I also spoke with Bill Marler, a Washington-based attorney who has litigated numerous food poisoning cases against the food industry, who made a similar point on his blog: “The lots that sickened more than a thousand confirmed cases—against state-reported numbers many times higher—were eaten and thrown away long before anyone thought to swab anything. A negative product sample in a Cyclospora outbreak, or the absence of a positive one, proves nothing.”

Hope that helps. There are a few cases locally and elsewhere in the state, but not many and while it’s a bit more than usual it’s not worrying anyone at this time. Michigan is Ground Zero, with New York next in line. If you eat at Taco Bell and haven’t gotten sick yet, you’re probably fine. But note the warning above, especially if you’re in a higher-risk category.

Your Local Epidemiologist and Defector’s Sabrina Imbler both wrote good in-depth stories about the parasite that transmits cyclospora and why we don’t know much about it and can’t easily track it. Slate’s What Next podcast also had a good explainer. And yes, you can totally blame Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and DOGE for making it harder, because of course they had a role in it. Anything involving uncomfortable quantities of shit almost certainly will have those three at the bottom of the pile. Go visit your local veggie co-op and wash your lettuce and berries thoroughly. Or ditch the veggies and house a sleeve of Oreos. I won’t judge. Finally, here’s how the New York City Health Department investigated a couple of smaller outbreaks earlier in the year, and either found the culprit or greatly narrowed it down. That’s how you do it.

Posted in Food, glorious food, Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of July 20

The Texas Progressive Alliance hopes that the Guadalupe River takes a nice long break from flooding in the future as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Off the Kuff enjoyed the political theater of an illegal voting complaint filed against Ken Paxton for his incorrect voter registration.

SocraticGadfly talked about how data centers have their expansions all planned in advance.

========================

And here are some posts of interest from other Texas blogs.

Your Local Epidemiologist answered your cyclospora questions.

City of Yes celebrated rowhomes.

Deceleration lauded human-created art.

The Austin Chronicle reported on the Texas GOP’s obsession with IVF and surrogacy.

Texas Monthly examined the longstanding fight to keep Galveston wild.

In the Pink Texas found the week’s most important news.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

July 2026 campaign finance reports: Harris County

PREVIOUSLY:

Statewide candidates
Legislative candidates

Here we go with the now much shorter list of Harris County candidates and officeholders. The January 2026 reports are here, the July 2025 reports are here and the January reports are here.

Letitia Plummer – Harris County Judge
Orlando Sanchez – Harris County Judge

Rodney Ellis – Commissioner, Precinct 1
Adrian Garcia – Commissioner, Precinct 2
Richard Vega – Commissioner, Precinct 2
Tom Ramsey – Commissioner, Precinct 3
Lesley Briones – Commissioner, Precinct 4
Steve Radack – Commissioner, Precinct 4

Abbie Kamin – Harris County Attorney
Jacqueline Lucci Smith – Harris County Attorney

Darrell Jordan – District Clerk
Chris Daniel (PAC) – District Clerk

Teneshia Hudspeth – Harris County Clerk
Mike Wolfe – Harris County Clerk

Carla Wyatt – Harris County Treasurer
Marc Cowart – Harris County Treasurer

Sean Teare
Ed Gonzalez
Joe Danna
Annette Ramirez

Annise Parker
Lina Hidalgo


Candidate     Raised       Spent       Loan     On Hand
=======================================================
Plummer      145,881      70,492     45,001      70,161
Sanchez      181,126      66,343    234,513     132,680

Ellis        784,332     438,979          0   8,608,576
Garcia     1,226,721   1,334,030          0   2,469,880
Vega         123,026      36,861          0      35,744
Ramsey        78,650     111,414          0   1,996,212
Briones      621,679     776,955          0   4,102,280
Radack        86,337      24,717          0     482,649

Kamin        252,182     316,497          0     284,589
Smith         24,654       7,288     10,000      22,082

Jordan         9,410      19,615     64,428       7,545
Daniel         8,071      14,334     25,000       6,571

Hudspeth      14,938      10,734          0      20,502
Wolfe              0         500          0           0

Wyatt            475         110          0       3,832
Cowart           150       1,750          0         150

Teare         11,690      28,333          0      11,248
Gonzalez      48,949       7,841          0     133,776
Danna            850       5,475     72,952       2,419
Ramirez       19,308       5,092          0      17,051
Parker        76,718      98,611          0     100,719
Hidalgo            0     213,997          0     139,071

Before I get into the numbers, I have one comment on the Chron story about the July reports.

In the closely watched race for Harris County judge, Republican nominee Orlando Sanchez outraised his Democratic opponent, Letitia Plummer, by roughly $35,000 from May 17 to June 30, according to campaign finance reports.

The July 15 filings are the first to be published since the May primary runoffs, and the pair have only just begun to turn their attention to November. But their campaigns have received renewed attention from donors: Both candidates received more contributions in the recent six-week reporting period than in the last six months of 2025.

Both parties’ contests this spring ended with runoff elections. Plummer delivered a narrow upset to former Houston Mayor Annise Parker, while Sanchez cruised to victory over businessman Warren Howell. Incumbent Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo is not seeking re-election.

“Sanchez has been a strong fundraiser in every office he’s run for and has got deep ties to the Houston community,” said University of Houston political scientist Brandon Rottinghaus. “Republicans are also hungry for a win, particularly business leaders and fiscal conservatives.”

But fundraising will be more crucial for Sanchez than for Plummer, Rottinghaus said.

Democrats are headed into November on strong footing as outrage to Trump administration policies builds among progressive voters, he said. Coupled with a competitive race for U.S. Senate topping the ballot, Rottinghaus said down-ballot Democrats are likely to benefit from the excitement generated by their counterparts running for statewide offices.

These broader headwinds mean Sanchez will have to significantly outraise Plummer to compete, he said.

“This is going to be a race where message beats money,” Rottinghaus said. “The message is what’s important, so in that way, the fundraising advantage that Sanchez has is sort of nullified.”

I agree with the latter part of Prof. Rottinghaus’ quote, but I disagree that Orlando Sanchez is a strong fundraiser of long term. The main elected office he’s held in this century has been Harris County Treasurer, and he never had to raise much for that. He reported raising $113K in January – I somehow forgot to include that in my January roundup, but here’s his January report – which was considerably less than the $501K that the Greg Abbott-backed Marty Lancton reported. He raised a bit less than $35K between January 1 and February 22, and then $107K from February 22 to May 16. Both he and Letitia Plummer were in primary runoffs, so the totals above for each of them reflect May 17 through June 30. Plummer raised $79K in that February to May period.

We all know about Greg Abbott’s threat to drop of ton of money on Harris County to turn it “dark red” this cycle. I’m sure he’ll spend some money here but I’m also sure his pollsters are telling him to dump money in the rural and exurban areas where Republicans run the strongest, because he and his fellow Rs are going to need their turnout to win. In the meantime, the Democrats here have three well-funded County Commissioners, two of whom are on the ballot while the third spends a lot of money in elections regardless, as well as whatever James Talarico spends here. I’m not too worried about what Orlando Sanchez is raising.

The Republicans do have their own Commissioners Court candidates. Steve Radack still has a few bucks from the old days, which he’ll need. More than half of Richard Vega’s haul – $67,600 – was non-monetary in-kind contributions. About $17K of that was related to a venue rental in April, I would assume for a fundraiser. The bulk of it, over $46K, was attributed to Sen. Mayes Middleton, who is now the Republican candidate for Attorney General. The report did not give any description of the three separate in-kind contributions, one each in March, April, and June, that added up to that amount.

As was the case in January, Lina Hidalgo keeps spending down her campaign account, and as before there’s a lot of consultant fees and travel, plus numerous donations to other campaigns and candidates. She gave $5K to her former chief of staff Angelica Luna Kaufman for her District C race, and on June 30 gave $10K to Letitia Plummer. I didn’t look at Annise Parker’s pre-May 16 filing report, but I expect she spent the bulk of her funds in that period. Darrell Jordan was also a runoff winner, so his report above is also for May 17 to June 30.

Other than Abbie Kamin, whose report runs from Feb 22 through June 30, no one outside of Commissioners Court raised much money. That’s pretty normal for these offices. I didn’t look at the HCDE candidates’ reports, as they usually have little of interest. I’ll check on the 30 day reports in October. Next up will be the city of Houston, and then Congress. Let me know what you think.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hollins complains about lack of response in Brown investigation

City drama.

Chris Brown

Chris Brown

Houston Controller Chris Hollins is accusing Mayor John Whitmire’s administration of refusing to provide records for an investigation into one of the mayor’s advisor, while the city’s top lawyer said the administration intends to cooperate.

The dispute unfolded nearly a month after Hollins announced an investigation into former Houston Controller Chris Brown, whose city building access records and email activity prompted questions about whether taxpayers received work in exchange for his $127,321 salary as Whitmire’s senior advisor for financial integrity.

Hollins told council members his office has received none of the records it requested after launching the investigation, despite giving the administration until July 10 to begin producing documents.

“We’ve gotten nothing except push back,” Hollins said at city council on Wednesday. “We’ve received no explanation as to when any of this stuff is coming, or if it is coming.”

[…]

Hollins said his office is seeking payroll records, time records, badge access logs, calendars, performance records, emails and other communications to determine whether taxpayer funds were properly spent, whether Brown performed work in exchange for his compensation and whether internal controls functioned as intended.

City Attorney Arturo Michel told council members the administration is gathering the requested information and intends to comply with the controller’s requests, but did not say when the city would provide the information.

“The mayor’s office has been cooperating,” Michel said. “We’re gathering the information and we’re fully going to cooperate.”

Michel noted private information, such as personal appointments on an employee’s Outlook calendar, won’t be provided.

Michel sent Hollins a letter July 1 arguing the city charter limits the controller’s investigative authority.

While acknowledging the controller may review whether taxpayer funds were properly authorized and whether the city received value in exchange for compensation, the letter said Hollins lacks authority to conduct a personnel investigation into Brown or the mayor’s hiring decisions.

See here for the background. One possible way this ends is in court, where a judge decides how much authority the Controller has and how much of the data Hollins has requested is relevant. I think it will get resolved before that happens, but it’s a possibility.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

It’s getting weird in Fort Bend

Is there a court date set to address this?

The fight over who is legally entitled to serve as Fort Bend County Judge is now disrupting the basic workings of county government, with officials clashing over whether Commissioners Court can legally conduct business and whether the county’s own attorneys can advise it behind closed doors.

Democratic Commissioners Grady Prestage and Dexter McCoy walked out of a June 25 meeting after arguing that interim County Judge Daniel Wong no longer had the authority to preside. They have not returned, leaving Wong and Republican Commissioners Andy Meyers and Vincent Morales as the only three members participating in meetings.

County Attorney Bridgette Smith-Lawson has also called for Wong to step down and has asked a judge to remove him from office.

At the July 16 meeting, the dispute created new complications as the County Attorney’s Office questioned whether the three remaining officials constitute a legal quorum and later said its attorneys could not participate in a closed session because of their ethical obligations.

Wong, Meyers and Morales pressed ahead, approving county business by 3-0 votes.

Among the items approved by the three-member court were more than $58.9 million in bills and other disbursements, a slate of engineering agreements and several legal settlements. The engineering items included a proposal aimed at preventing the Pinion Court subdivision from becoming a cut-through route to the freeway.

See here and here for the most recent updates. The dispute from this latest meeting, which may or may not have had a quorum depending on Wong’s status, included a disagreement about whether the County Attorney was required to attend and if a private attorney hired by the county could substitute if the County Attorney was absconding on their duty. I don’t know when one or both of the lawsuits over this is scheduled for a court hearing, but sooner would be better. As I’ve said, I don’t know what the legalities of this unprecedented situation are, but it’s clear at this point that Someone Is Very Wrong about it, and if that someone turns out to be Wong and the Republicans, then they’ve been conducting a lot of business that would seem to be illegitimate. There is potentially a very big mess that will need to be cleaned up if that is the case. So yeah, let’s get this before a judge ASAP, before it gets any messier.

Posted in Election 2026, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

July 2026 campaign finance reports: State legislature

PREVIOUSLY:

Statewide candidates

As was the case with statewide candidates, I haven’t taken a close look at the finance reports for legislative races of interest so far, and for the same reason – there wasn’t much to say in January, and in recent cycles at least there hasn’t been much to look at. This year we know there’s a national push to flip a number of State House seats – not quite enough to reach a majority if you run the table, but enough to make things a lot tighter in the lower chamber. Guided by that collection of races, for which I will stick to the flip targets, let’s see how we’re doing.

Sen. Taylor Rehmet – SD09

Stephanie Guerrero Saenz – HD34
Ozzie Ochoa – HD37
Chris Jimenez – HD52
Brittany Black – HD61
Jordan Wheatley – HD67
Katie O’Brien Duzan – HD94
Allison Mitchell – HD108
Zachary Herbert – HD112
Kristian Carranza – HD118
Zack Dunn – HD121
Josh Wallenstein – HD133
Tyler Smith – HD138


Dist  Name             Raised      Spent      Loans    On Hand
==============================================================
SD09  Rehmet          380,152    276,263          0    102,511

HD34  Guerrero Saenz   81,278      5,113          0     39,692
HD37  Ochoa            30,968      2,483          0     12,786
HD52  Jimenez         129,689     20,713          0     28,559
HD61  Black            27,279     14,124     65,035     79,459
HD67  Wheatley         29,543      1,471        750     21,148
HD94  O'Brien Duzan   119,297     14,033        940     75,236
HD108 Mitchell         91,751     36,728          0     79,370
HD112 Herbert         183,747     33,099      4,592    141,607
HD118 Carranza        311,145    117,337          0    223,336
HD121 Dunn            144,786     61,275          0     57,181
HD133 Wallenstein     161,767     57,394      9,874    109,654
HD138 Smith            97,311     14,802          0     81,847

Ozzie Ochoa won in a runoff, so his report only covers May 19 through June 30. Everyone else covers all six months or the period from January 22 through June 30.

I’m including Sen. Taylor Rehmet in here in part because he’s the highest-profile legislative candidate and because he’d still count as a flip if he wins, since he hasn’t served during a session just yet. His total so far is just fine, and I expect him to have plenty of cash for his full-term election effort.

Candidates Ochoa, Black, and Wheatley stand out at the lower end. Ochoa’s total as noted is only from the last six weeks of the period, but he only raised about $13K in the almost five months before then, so it’s not like he was really a big moneymaker. I assume the various committees will get around to these three to boost their candidacies, they just hadn’t done so as of June 30.

If you want to see what that support might look like, take a peek at some of the other reports. I looked at the ones for Chris Jimenez and Katie O’Brien Duzan, to understand the gap between the totals raised and on hand. As expected, they – and quite a few of the others – had a significant amount of in-kind contributions. Over $70K for Jimenez and over $40K for O’Brien Duzan. That all shows up in the report for things like political consulting and reporting, and staff salaries, from groups like the Agave Fund, the Lone Star Project, and the DLCC. Some others had in-kind totals in the $20K to $40K range; I just looked at the more detailed summary for them and didn’t scroll down for the particulars of those donations. This is what you’d expect and I’m sure we’ll see more of it in future reports.

Outside of the Harris County contingent and Kristian Carranza, I’m mostly not familiar with these House hopefuls. I’d say overall they’ve done a good job with their fundraising so far, and I’m hopeful that will continue. If all goes really well, maybe the target list will expand a bit more. I do believe there’s room for that. As I said with the statewide candidates post, it’s folks like these that can help boost turnout efforts in various specific locations. Get to know the candidates nearest to you and see what you can do to help them.

Next up will be Harris County. Let me know what you think.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on July 2026 campaign finance reports: State legislature