One wishes for a less dichotomous ending for the staid Queen. Egads! Bad enough when her new reading habits throw spanners into the works of the equerries, a sudden cat among the pigeons. But now she must choose between duty to her country, a pawn of officialdom, or duty to an awakened, autonomous self, able to absorb and think and feel what others think and feel.
How did this happen?
“The appeal of reading, she thought, lay in its indifference: there was something undeferring about literature. Books did not care who was reading them or whether one read them or not. All readers were equal, herself included. Literature, she thought, is a commonwealth…Books did not defer. All readers were equal…[Reading] was anonymous; it was shared; it was common. And she who had led a life apart now found that she craved it. Here in the pages and between these covers she could get unrecognized.” (30-31)
And then what? What to do with this new found empathic capability?
“Books have enriched my life in a way that one could never have expected. But books can only take one so far and now I think it is time that from being a reader I become, or try to become, a writer.” (111)
And the equerries would be no help. On the contrary, she must escape them:
“No one was going to tell her, she thought. Writing, like reading, was something she was going to have to do on her own.” (105)
She would become, in short, a commoner, a common reader, a common writer, too, no doubt. Perhaps she would start a blog.
“The Uncommon Reader,” by Alan Bennett, Picador, 2007.






























